AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sonya Reichel

MATH340 · MATH335 · MATHMATH · MATH400 · STAT300 · STATS300 · ALGEBRA · MATH120 · TRIG335ARC · MATH343 · MATH401 · MATH355 · MATH330 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Strongly take Reichel if you want a more manageable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsCaring and helpfulFair examsTake-home quizzesGenerous support
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Reichel as , and and statistics.
  • The workload is usually reasonable, with many comments noting no required homework, take-home quizzes, note cards, or fair tests.
  • Some higher-level courses still require steady studying, and because quizzes and exams track class work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students say good grades , and modest studying, though not every course is effortless.

Online evidence is limited and stresses attendance, while , note cards, and generous grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Math and statistics can be hard, but to understand.

The one online review calls the pace fast, while easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

because quizzes, examples, and test preparation are tied closely to class sessions.

The online review explicitly says students must come to class, and to success.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and .

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation is driven mainly by the large in-person review base.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students report replacement, and generous credit.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews provide strong evidence of student-friendly grading.

Workload

Light

78/100

Many reviews mention no required , and reasonable workload despite frequent quizzes.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions fast pacing, while as reasonable or light.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently , and ability to make math understandable.

Format shift

Both formats are positive, but the and more detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades are often based on quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

Online assessment evidence is unclear, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

assessments, and willingness to help students succeed.

Main concern

, and preparation for quizzes or exams.

What students said

“She makes the concepts very easy to understand and will work with you until you get it.”
MATH400
“No busy work.”
STAT300
“ !! She is the sweetest professor ever and she teaches so well.”
MATH340

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online and caring, but the class is fast paced and .

Main concern

The online evidence is limited and mentions fast pacing.

What students said

“Good overall. Very helpful but you must come to class!!”
STATS300
“A lot of info given and fast paced.”
STATS300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are generally student-friendly, with many reports of , and score replacement.

Open Book QuizzesTake-Home QuizzesTake-Home TestsNote Card AllowedFair ExamsScore Replacement

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe student-friendly exams and quizzes, , and fair tests tied to class examples.

Open Book QuizzesTake-Home QuizzesTake-Home TestsNote Card AllowedFair ExamsScore Replacement
“ , and classmates.”
STAT300
“2 in-class exams, 1 take-home, 1 in-class final.”
MATH330
“She lets you use a note .”
STAT300
“ .”
ALGEBRA

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz, exam, proctoring, webcam, or open-book policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes the concepts very easy to understand and will work with you until you get it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She makes the concepts very easy to understand and will work with you until you get it.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“If she is an option, definitely sign up for her class.”

⚖️

86/100

“Looks for ways to give you as much credit as possible.”

🧪

86/100

“ , and classmates.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the concepts very easy to understand and will work with you until you get it.
  • She takes the clarity and examples.
  • She makes everything so easy to understand, all you really have to do is attend the class to understand the work.
  • Her teaching skills are wonderful, she makes hard problems easy to understand and goes over things step by step.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No busy work.
  • Your grade depends on you and how much you are willing to study.
  • Approach her lectures as more a resource for clarification than one of learning raw material.
  • Looks for ways to give you as much credit as possible.

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessments

  • , and classmates.
  • The and super straight forward.
  • .
  • .

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • and understanding.
  • She is perfectly reasonable with her expectations and testquiz problems.
  • She is ready to help anyone who needs it.
  • She is the sweetest professor ever and she teaches so well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years are detailed and highly consistent about clear teaching, helpfulness, fair assessment, and manageable workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 574
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

STAT30013 reviews
STATS3009 reviews
MATH4007 reviews
MATH3434 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH4013 reviews
MATH3302 reviews
MATH3402 reviews
MATH3552 reviews
1201 review
ALGEBRA1 review
MATH3351 review
MATHMATH1 review
TRIG335ARC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1