AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Hoyt Fong

CNCLR101 · HS310 · PSYCHOLOGY · HSER302JUL14 · HSER320 · PSYCH358 · HSERV302 · PSY358 · COUNSELOR · CLASS · HUMANSERVICES · PSYCH302 · HSER302 · HSER312 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take him if you want a reflective, intense, discussion-heavy class, but if you dislike personal sharing, profanity, strict timing, or .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLife changingIntrospective workStrict attendanceLots of journalsPolarizing personality
  • Many students found the class personally meaningful, funny, and memorable.
  • The course demands introspection, writing, participation, and emotional openness rather than technical difficulty.
  • Some students describe him as rude, offensive, argumentative, or hard to communicate with.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible if students consistently write introspectively, attend, and complete journals, but the emotional and writing effort is real.

, while the single online review also frames the class as challenging for self-expression.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The academic content is not conceptually hard, but the class is challenging because it requires deep self-reflection and personal discussion.

Both formats describe introspection as the main challenge, with far more evidence from in-person classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and being on time are strict, and missing class can count as an absence or block late work.

Strict attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students who , but others warn against his offensive or difficult communication style.

, and the single online review is cautiously positive but notes discomfort.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

61/100

if students follow the introspective writing formula, but he expects depth and may be strict about late work.

Format shift

Most grading evidence is from in-person reviews, with self-expression.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly mention , and repetitive self-reflective work.

Format shift

, while the online review does not detail workload volume.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many students call him inspiring, funny, and life changing, but serious complaints about rudeness and offensiveness lower the score.

Format shift

and strong criticism, while the online review calls him professional but possibly offensive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven mostly by journals, homework, introspective writing, group work, and .

Format shift

, while online assessment details are not clearly proven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

his life-changing teaching while others criticize his strictness, profanity, and communication style.

Main concern

The main concern is that his introspective, personal, and sometimes abrasive style can feel uncomfortable or offensive.

What students said

“THIS CLASS IS LIFE CHANGING.”
HSER302
“Funny, stern, offensive, inspirational , and life changing.”
CLASS
“I don't recommend to take his class.”
HSER302

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review says the class is challenging for students who struggle with self-expression but can teach valuable life skills.

Main concern

The main concern is emotional discomfort from personal expression and feeling offended.

What students said

“This class is challenging for people who have a hard time expressing themselves.”
HSER302JUL14
“he can give you valuable life skills, even if you feel offended.”
HSER302JUL14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and finals, making exams relatively student-friendly despite workload and attendance strictness.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalPart In-Class FinalPolicy Not Fully Proven Online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, with one review saying the final is partly in class.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalPart In-Class Final
“ and final is part take home/part in class.”
HSER302
“ ”
HSER302
“ and final.”
HSER320

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the final policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Funny, stern, offensive, inspirational , and life changing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“THIS CLASS IS LIFE CHANGING.”

📚 Workload Pattern

34/100

“Just lots of .”

⚖️ Fit Matters

58/100

“This class is challenging for people who have a hard time expressing themselves.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lectures, super funny dude.
  • Funny, stern, offensive, inspirational , and life changing.
  • if you deserve it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Good luck writing journals cause he's looking for introspective.
  • stick to this and you'll get an A.
  • Lots of homework but its all introspective, no right or wrong answers.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Experience

  • This class is life changing and it doesn't even matter if you're in the human services field.
  • It made me into a better person in just 4 months.
  • I don't recommend to take his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 31 reviews across many years with repeated, detailed, and consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HSER30217 reviews
HSERV3022 reviews
CLASS1 review
CNCLR1011 review
COUNSELOR1 review
Show 9 more courses
HS3101 review
HSER302JUL141 review
HSER3121 review
HSER3201 review
HUMANSERVICES1 review
PSY3581 review
PSYCH3021 review
PSYCH3581 review
PSYCHOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1