AI Rate Professor

English

Gregory Strawn

ENGWR101 · ENGWR300 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a demanding writing class and can handle revision-heavy expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEssay HeavySerious Students OnlyHelpful For SomeTough GraderMixed Clarity
  • Older reviews praise Strawn as engaging, helpful, and a strong teacher.
  • The , and repeated essay revisions.
  • The course seems best for serious students comfortable with writing-heavy work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Grades are possible, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person English reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is writing-intensive and demanding, especially in ENGWR300.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person comments mention lectures but do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Recommendation is mixed because some students learned a lot while one recent student found the and unhelpful.

All and varies by student expectations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

The newest review tags him as a and describes repeated essay revisions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Essay volume and repeated revisions create a heavy workload for writing students.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Several students call him helpful, interesting, and effective, but the and poor support.

Format shift

and is mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments emphasize essays, revisions, and writing work rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for learning and teaching but , and clarity.

Main concern

Students may face heavy essays, repeated revisions, and .

What students said

“Lots of and fix them over and over.”
ENGWR300
“He is a professor for individuals who are serious about their schooling.”
ENGWR101
“Hard, but a very good teacher”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and revisions, and they do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy, proctoring method, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a professor for individuals who are serious about their schooling.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, writing workload, and student fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Hard, but a very good teacher”

📝 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Lots of and fix them over and over.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made class fun and interesting.
  • He teaches his lessons from personal experience uses them as examples for his lessons which is something we all can relate to.
  • Didn't help me when I asked, instead told me to re-watch lectures.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of and fix them over and over.
  • and instructions.
  • Hard, but a very good teacher

Theme 3

🎓 About Fit

  • He is a professor for individuals who are serious about their schooling.
  • As I said before he is a professor for serious students only.
  • I have learned lots from this professor and if I can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, and the newest review conflicts sharply with older positive comments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR1012 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B 2 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values