AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Amy Bao Guan

MATH351 · MATH100 · MATH15352 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in math and can learn quickly with limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast PacedUnclear LecturesDifficult TestsHeavy HomeworkLow Recommendation
  • and poor question support.
  • Tests are difficult and .
  • One and questions supported, but this is the minority view.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students report , and low grades.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content feels harder because lectures are fast, note-taking is difficult, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they mostly describe a fast-paced classroom experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

, but none clearly proves a policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because they found the , and poorly supported.

Only in-person reviews exist, and most are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and few grading items point to a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention lots of , and a final in a fast-paced course.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most reviews criticize clarity, pacing, and responsiveness, despite one positive note-taking experience.

Format shift

outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

One review says grading is based on four tests, four homeworks, and a .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and weak support.

Main concern

Students struggle with speed, clarity, and difficult exams.

What students said

“do yourself a favor and .”
MATH100
“She speeds through material and .”
MATH351
“Her lectures lacked clarity, and she always seemed to be in too much of a hurry to get through the material.”
MATH15352

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and a final, but .

Difficult TestsFew Graded ItemsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final but do not clearly prove the .

Difficult TestsFinal Exam
“ .”
MATH351
“Graded by 4 tests, 4 homeworks, and the final.”
MATH351
“She would not give any hint of what to expect on a test.”
MATH15352

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures lacked clarity, and she always seemed to be in too much of a hurry to get through the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Her lectures lacked clarity, and she always seemed to be in too much of a hurry to get through the material.”

⚠️

25/100

“She speeds through material and .”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She speaks to the board and doesnt really answer your questions.
  • Her lectures lacked clarity, and she always seemed to be in too much of a hurry to get through the material.
  • She writes out her lectures clearly on the whiteboard so .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Out of the entire class about 4 people passed, and it was a large class.
  • A fast paced class with lots of homework and tests.
  • Graded by 4 tests, 4 homeworks, and the final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

negative pattern with one positive outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1002 reviews
MATH153521 review
MATH3511 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values