AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mark Hunter

MATH335 · MATH112 · MATH20 · MATH102 · MATH120 · MATH370 · MATH350 · MATH30 · MATH20301 · MUH1000 · MATH110 · MATH125 · MATH100 · MATH104 · 123 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you struggle with math and want a , but be cautious if you need maximum rigor for advanced math.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear math explanationsVery helpfulFunny and energeticEasy testsWorksheet-based practice
  • Most students describe him as a caring, funny math professor who makes difficult material easier to understand.
  • Grades are often easy if students attend, complete worksheets, and use reviews or practice work.
  • A minority warn that some classes may feel too easy or use a teaching style that does not prepare students enough for later math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

89/100

Students often report , and strong grades if they show up and do worksheets.

All Easy A evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

He is repeatedly said to make math easy through clear explanations, shortcuts, reviews, worksheets, and patient pacing.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person math reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, and lectures, but some reviews say homework or attendance can be optional in certain classes.

, and they vary by course.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

because he helps struggling math students understand material and pass with confidence.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Reviews mention easy tests, multiple choice , and grading that rewards effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

There are , and projects, but many students say the workload is manageable and directly prepares them for tests.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, patience, humor, energy, and willingness to help, despite a few complaints about rigor and style.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention worksheets, homework, , and finals.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is entirely in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe him as , and unusually accessible for students who dislike or struggle with math.

Main concern

Some students say his style is too easy, too shortcut-based, or not rigorous enough for later math courses.

What students said

“ and needs someone to break it down clearly for them.”
MATH104
“ . Gives a lot of daily work but you can do with rest of class.”
MATH370
“ level or you will struggle later on because you didn't learn enough.”
MATH335

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because reviews mention multiple-choice tests, take-home or redo options, dropped scores, and strong review alignment.

Multiple Choice TestsTake-Home TestRedo TestDropped Test ScoreReview-Based Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe mostly student-friendly exams, including multiple-choice tests, a , and dropped scores, but policies vary by course.

Multiple Choice TestsTake-Home TestRedo TestDropped Test ScoreReview-Based Exams
“The and no more than 20 Q's.”
MATH125
“ and .”
MATH350
“He .”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and needs someone to break it down clearly for them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grades, workload, and rigor. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and needs someone to break it down clearly for them.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“If math is a .”

📈 Easy A Potential

89/100

“If you keep up with the work, you'll get an A or B.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes math way easy and a lot of fun.
  • .
  • and helpful.
  • He tries to keep everyone up to speed and guide others to additional resources as needed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is really easy and so are the test.
  • and are not hard at all.
  • If you keep up with the work, you'll get an A or B.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Rigor

  • He is a nice teacher but not the
  • Every1 I know who passed his 370 class last fall is failing calc now.
  • Class can be hard because he uses a different method of teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

123

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 in-person reviews across many courses and years, with highly consistent praise and clearly repeated concerns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5102
4 out of 513
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH12013 reviews
MATH307 reviews
MATH1006 reviews
MATH1024 reviews
MATH1254 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH3504 reviews
MATH3703 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH3352 reviews
MATH1041 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1121 review
MATH203011 review
MUH10001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1