AI Rate Professor

Radio TV Film

Wilber Johnson

RTVF316 · RTVF362 · JOUR320 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him only if you can handle uneven lectures and , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing experienceDisorganized lecturesReading requiredFairly easy assignmentsRespectful to some students
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him supportive and .
  • Negative comments focus , and wasted class time.
  • The course can be fairly easy for students who keep up with D2L, readings, and lab work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Grades can be good if students stay current on assignments and reading, but tough-grader tags and A.

All evidence comes from four in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material and assignments sound manageable, but and required reading make the course feel less easy.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the score reflects classroom comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as necessary, and comments suggest missing class can hurt because structure is already uneven.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students praise his respect and flexibility while others strongly warn against his disorganization.

Recommendation and is evenly divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Two A grades suggest success is possible, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students , and reading, but no one describes the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

46/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with strong praise from some students but serious , and forgetfulness.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and strongly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The , and reading rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with two very positive experiences and .

Main concern

Lecture organization is the main risk because students describe tangents, messy slides, and rushed coverage.

What students said

“Absolute gem of an instructor and .”
RTVF362
“ and he never makes any sense.”
JOUR320
“Make sure you read the book!”
RTVF316

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policies or proctoring requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and he never makes any sense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“ and he never makes any sense.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Absolute gem of an instructor and .”

📚 Workload And Reading

58/100

“Make sure you stay and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wonderful, very outgoing and respectful professor who actually understands that life can get in the way of school.
  • Never had a professor go off on random tangents and get off topic so easily.
  • Very boring lectures and you leave feeling like your time was wasted because you didn't cover most of the material in his slides.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Fairly easy course!
  • Make sure you stay and .
  • Make sure you read the book!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited because there are only four in-person reviews with sharply mixed opinions and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RTVF3162 reviews
JOUR3201 review
RTVF3621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values