AI Rate Professor

Architecture

William T Kirkham

ADT300 · ADTALL · ADT317 · ADT302 · ADT316 · ARCHITECTURE · ARCH302 · DRAFT · ADT310 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can work independently and tolerate uneven pacing and mixed support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful When AskedPolarizing TeachingEasy to PassLong ClassesFair but Uneven
  • Students and frustrating, dismissive classroom experiences.
  • Many reviews say the classes are easy to pass if , but .
  • No online reviews are present, so all evidence reflects in-person architecture and drafting courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earned high grades and say doing the work is enough, but failures and easy A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course content is usually manageable, but outdated materials, long classes, and ratings suggest.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person architecture and drafting classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though long in-person class sessions and in-class work appear important.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not clearly prove strict or .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on student fit because reviews praise his help but also include severe complaints about teaching quality and respect.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades appear mostly attainable through completed work, but some reviews describe strict outcomes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload sounds steady and assignment-based, with some long sessions but few claims of overwhelming volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching is highly inconsistent, with some students calling him clear and helpful while others describe him as .

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and opinions are strongly split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but inconsistent class experience with both strong help and serious complaints about respect and clarity.

Main concern

Students and ask precise questions to get useful help.

What students said

“just do your work and you'll be fine.”
ADT310
“Not a good teacher at all, he takes pride on putting people down in front of others, very disrespectful and demeaning.”
ADT310
“ .”
ADT317

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , so exam risk cannot be established beyond assignment-heavy assessment.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignment-focused grading

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, midterm, or final exam policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format
“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”
ARCH302
“Be very detailed and precise!”
ADT300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good teacher. Him and . answers questions clearly. classes tend to be big so you have to wait your turn to get an answer for your questions. a lot of freedom in class. just do your work and you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ .”

⚖️

58/100

“do your work on time and you'll be ok”

⚠️ Student Fit

45/100

“Was not inspiring or knowledgeable. It was a total waste of a semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very willing to help if you are in need of it.
  • He talks in a monotone voice so drink caffeine before class!
  • Not a good teacher at all, he takes pride on putting people down in front of others, very disrespectful and demeaning.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • just do your work and you'll be fine.
  • Your IQ has to be non-existent if you can't pass one of Kirkham's classes.
  • I recieved a 79.6 percent and he still gave me a C. what a jerk.

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Structure

  • We never followed the book.
  • We either do almost nothing the whole time or and pages of notes the whole time.
  • We worked through a lot of work by guessing and checking as a class because the workbook the Prof. used was out of date or something...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 28 reviews span many years and show consistent themes, though some comments are vague or emotionally extreme.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ADT3109 reviews
ADT3178 reviews
ADT3003 reviews
ADT3162 reviews
ARCH3022 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ADT3021 review
ADTALL1 review
ARCHITECTURE1 review
DRAFT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1