AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Angelica Cortes

MATH300 · MATH100 · MATH30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can , and active participation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLecture heavyFast-pacedParticipation requiredMixed teaching impact
  • Two reviews describe her as boring, fast, and frustrating to follow.
  • Grading and participation expectations sound strict despite one student having a very positive experience.
  • The class is not a low-effort A because students mention , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible, but , and participation demands.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

One student calls the class fairly easy, but fast teaching and confusion make the content harder to manage.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and comments strongly suggest skipping class hurts performance and participation matters.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because most reviews describe the class as frustrating, though one student found her transformative.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students report and strict written-work expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload sounds heavy because reviews mention lots of , and detailed written math steps.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with two students calling her boring or confusing and one praising her respect and support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews , and grading, but do not clearly show an exam-heavy structure.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and one strongly positive review.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and heavy participation expectations.

What students said

“She teaches fast and does not give you time to write things down fully.”
MATH100
“Never have I ever been a math student but this teacher really changed that for me.”
MATH300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She teaches fast and does not give you time to write things down fully.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She is boring and unenthusiastic almost as if she doesn't want to be there as bad as we do.”

⚖️

22/100

“I mean, she did dock me .5 points for drawing uneven shapes...”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“She makes you write down each math problem word for word before solving it ON EVERYTHING.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring, unenthusiastic and rude.
  • She teaches fast and does not give you time to write things down fully.
  • Never have I ever been a math student but this teacher really changed that for me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Fairly easy class but if you can't deal with professors like this, look elsewhere.
  • I mean, she did dock me .5 points for drawing uneven shapes...
  • She makes you write down each math problem word for word before solving it ON EVERYTHING.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are sharply mixed.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1001 review
MATH301 review
MATH3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1