AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Sandra Conway

ACCT301 · ACCT101 · ACCOUNTING301 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take Sandra Conway if you can keep up with a fast accounting class and want strong instruction with extra-credit opportunities.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra creditAccounting expertiseFast paceHelpful lecturesAttendance matters
  • Most students praise Sandra Conway's accounting knowledge, notes, examples, and .
  • Several students warn that she moves quickly, runs over time, and can leave struggling students behind.
  • and lecture materials can strongly help grades, but the and steady work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic because of and strong notes, but , and steady effort.

, while the single online review only reports a positive A- experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

She can make accounting understandable, but the pace and some students.

and fast pacing, while online evidence is too brief to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because lectures, quizzes, examples, and PowerPoints drive success.

; the online review gives no attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students praise her teaching and , but the low recent recommendation signals real risk for students who need slower pacing.

The online review is positive but sparse, while and serious warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

is mentioned often and several students earned high grades, though some exams and .

Format shift

, while the online review only reports an A- .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload , and exam prep, but helps offset the pressure.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most , and enthusiastic, but a minority describe poor pacing and organization.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive but brief, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear , and rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

; the online review does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about teaching and , but some students , and disorganization.

Main concern

Students who fall behind may struggle because the class can move quickly.

What students said

“she moves quick and if you get left behind, you are totally screwed”
ACCT301
“She's giving tons of that will boost your grades if you need it.”
ACCOUNTING301
“This is the .”
ACCT301

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive but too brief to prove much beyond satisfaction.

Main concern

Online evidence is too .

What students said

“I wish she teach acct 311 also.”
ACCT301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are mentioned, but reviews do not .

Exams Based On Lecture And HomeworkPop QuizzesPractice Material Mismatch ReportedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Exams Based On Lecture And HomeworkPop QuizzesPractice Material Mismatch Reported
“ and hw!”
ACCT101
“ ”
ACCOUNTING301
“nothing on her practice website exercises was on the exam”
ACCT101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or quiz format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was not looking forward to taking an accounting class, but Professor Conway made it easy to understand and easy to succeed if you are willing to put the time in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Conway made it easy to understand and easy to succeed if you are willing to put the time in.”

💰

76/100

“She's giving tons of that will boost your grades if you need it.”

⚠️ Pace Risk

64/100

“she moves quick and if you get left behind, you are totally screwed”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This is the .
  • Amazing teacher. She is so sweet and so helpful.
  • She also make all the lesson easier to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • wouldnt say she's an easy A, but knows accounting well and .
  • !!
  • EASY A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Pace & Organization

  • Moves to fast , leaves you behind
  • Takes forever to grade anything and
  • she keeps class over class time a lot too

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, despite some older comments and one sparse online review.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT30111 reviews
ACCOUNTING3013 reviews
ACCT1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2