AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Dana Wassmer

NUTRI310 · NUTRI340 · NUTRI300 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are prepared for and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely hard examsTough graderHeavy readingPoor teaching experienceAvoid online
  • Students consistently describe the exams as impossibly hard and confusing.
  • Online reviews are strongly negative, with .
  • The .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears extremely unlikely because students report and studying.

The strongest Easy A evidence comes from online reviews, while the .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

The course content is experienced as overwhelming because lectures, readings, and and confusing.

Online reviews describe the course as extremely difficult, and the and poor test preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online nor in-person evidence gives a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students strongly discourage taking the class because and feel unfairly hard.

Online reviews are strongly avoidant, while the class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

because and students report failing despite preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the difficult tests.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Workload feels , and dense exam preparation.

Format shift

Online students emphasize hard material and tests, while the in-person review mentions 50-90 page lectures.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe the professor as , and one of .

Format shift

, and the in-person review gives limited but still critical support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Assessment appears exam-centered, with one review saying exams make up 80% of the grade.

Format shift

, while the in-person review also focuses on tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only in-person review mainly warns against the online class and .

Main concern

and lack study guides.

What students said

“ .”
NUTRI300

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report , and very negative experiences.

Main concern

Exams feel far harder than the course preparation supports.

What students said

“80% of the and they are impossibly hard.”
NUTRI310
“ .”
NUTRI340

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as , and central to the grade.

Exam-HeavyVery Hard TestsOnline Essay QuestionsLimited Time

Assessment risk

Strict

5/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and time-limited, but reviews do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring.

Very Difficult TestsNot Enough Time
“ .”
NUTRI300

Online

Online reviews support an and online essay questions, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Exam-HeavyVery Hard TestsOnline Essay Questions
“80% of the and they are impossibly hard.”
NUTRI310
“ ?”
NUTRI340

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“80% of the and they are impossibly hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ .”

⚠️

5/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

2/100

“ .”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • 80% of the and they are impossibly hard.
  • .
  • the questions are so twisted in a way that even .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of material
  • Lectures are 50-90 pages and no study guides are given to help prepare for tests.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only four reviews exist, but they are consistent and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

NUTRI3002 reviews
NUTRI3101 review
NUTRI3401 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1