AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Andrew Connelly

ANTHRO310 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid Andrew Connelly unless you , and a paper-heavy structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganizedTough GraderTest HeavyMany Papers
  • The only review describes the professor as .
  • Tests were harder than the material students studied.
  • , and and test pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because tests are harder than preparation and .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels challenging because and the .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

No format-specific attendance evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The because the , and graded harshly.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The review explicitly says he grades grammar in essays and tags him as a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The tags identify many papers and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The only student comment and did not prepare students well for tests.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears to include both assigned essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review is strongly negative, citing , and a test-heavy course.

Main concern

The main concern is that tests and .

What students said

“ .”
ANTHRO310
“the .”
ANTHRO310
“he grades grammer in assigned essays.”
ANTHRO310

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy, but the as harder than the studied material and test-heavy.

Hard TestsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or final format.

Hard TestsTest Heavy
“the .”
ANTHRO310

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in organization, tests, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ .”

📝

25/100

“the .”

⚖️

18/100

“he grades grammer in assigned essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he grades grammer in assigned essays.
  • the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it is specific and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHRO3101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values