AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Troy Prather

ACCOUNTING301 · COST126 · ACCTACCT · ACCT301 · ACCT101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can stay current and want a structured accounting class, but expect some gaps in explanation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStep By Step ExplanationsStructured ClassMixed Teaching ClarityReal Life ExamplesKeep Up Required
  • Students praise and uses real-life examples.
  • Several reviews say students must keep up with reading and .
  • Some students found his teaching style incomplete or unhelpful on specific work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

if students keep up with reading and homework, but comments do not support a low-effort A.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The , but accounting still requires steady preparation.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

No online reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and explanations, though several reviews question parts of his teaching style.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

easier only when students keep up and no strong evidence of curves or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading and , but reviews do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is often described as , and practical, but .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is fully in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Comments mention homework, reading, tests, and a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive but uneven, with strong structure and examples .

Main concern

Some students felt class examples and coverage.

What students said

“ if you are not understand.”
ACCT101
“You really need to keep up with the reading and ”
ACCOUNTING301
“He just put up pre-completed overheadmaterial and didn't go over the how.”
ACCT301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard tests tied to reading and policies.

Tests Require PreparationSome Coverage MismatchNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

57/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Tests Require PreparationSome Coverage Mismatch
“You really need to keep up with the reading and ”
ACCOUNTING301
“First test had verbiage on 3 questions that were not dicussed nor in the textbook.”
ACCT301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Prather explans things step by step so it was easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessment fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Prather explans things step by step so it was easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Professor prather .he is a great teacher.”

⚖️

58/100

“You really need to keep up with the reading and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • if you are not understand.
  • He uses real life examples to keep a dry subject interesting.
  • He just put up pre-completed overheadmaterial and didn't go over the how.

Theme 2

📈

  • You really need to keep up with the reading and
  • First test had verbiage on 3 questions that were not dicussed nor in the textbook.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide useful detail, but most are old and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCTACCT2 reviews
ACCOUNTING3011 review
ACCT1011 review
ACCT3011 review
COST1261 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1