AI Rate Professor

English

Steve Abeyta

ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if you want a fair, approachable .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesUseful Essay FeedbackFair GradingApproachableWriting Heavy
  • Students consistently describe lectures as , and discussion-friendly.
  • The class requires real writing effort, especially grammar editing and essay structure.
  • as fair, with and flexibility in essay topics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A seems realistic with serious grammar editing, strong rhetoric, and completed essays, but it is not effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The writing concepts are made understandable, though the 8-week pace and .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews emphasize discussion and participation but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews mention classroom participation, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Students describe grading as fair and tied to grammar, rhetoric, and essay structure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload centers on essays and can feel heavy in an 8-week format.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently , and helpful feedback.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews describe essays, grammar editing, and writing structure rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a and useful essay feedback.

Main concern

The main concern is the amount of essay writing in the faster 8-week course.

What students said

“His lectures were entertaining and easy to understand.”
ENGWR101
“It was tough for my class because it was a quick 8 week course, alot of essays.”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove an .

Essay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Make sure to do serious grammar editing before you turn in your essays”
ENGWR302
“You write mostly whatever you want and he grades fairly.”
ENGWR302

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures were entertaining and easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“His lectures were entertaining and easy to understand.”

⚖️

70/100

“You write mostly whatever you want and he grades fairly.”

📝 Writing Workload

55/100

“It was tough for my class because it was a quick 8 week course, alot of essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were entertaining and easy to understand.
  • He's , and easy to approach.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing and Grades

  • !
  • Make sure to do serious grammar editing before you turn in your essays
  • You write mostly whatever you want and he grades fairly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and they are older, but the comments are detailed and consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3022 reviews
ENGWR1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values