AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Troung Thanh

MATH29 · MATH300 · MATH · CHEM1210 · MATH102 · MATH120 · INTERMEDIATEAL · ALG · MATH125 · MATH100 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandSelf-Teaching RequiredOpen Notes ExamsLots of HomeworkLenient Policies
  • Many students say his accent, skipped steps, and .
  • Several reviews mention open-book or open-notes tests, late work, and .
  • , and already being strong in math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some grading policies are lenient, but students still , and a high risk of struggling.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels hard because students report , and unfamiliar test questions.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while another says students need class notes to pass.

, and they conflict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because they found the and often had to teach themselves.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Despite poor teaching reviews, students mention open notes, , and grade slack.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and heavy studying.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

30/100

Many students say he is hard to understand, skips steps, makes mistakes, and leaves them teaching themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and finals.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and teaching, though some students note flexible grading and open-note testing.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say he is hard to understand and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH29
“Be prepared to teach yourself everything the course should cover.”
CHEM1210
“Attendence is not stressed, he takes late work, books allowed on the test”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but students still describe the tests as difficult and unclear.

Open Notes ExamsOpen Book ExamsTest CorrectionsTake-Home ExamHard Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention open-book or , and one take-home exam, but .

Open Notes ExamsOpen Book ExamsTest CorrectionsTake-Home ExamHard Tests
“ .... so overall easy pass.”
MATH125
“lets you use notes and book for tests and exams.”
MATH100
“ as well.”
MATH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself everything the course should cover.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Be prepared to teach yourself everything the course should cover.”

⚖️

72/100

“ so overall easy pass.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Lots of studying is needed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes mistakes in the lectures, , and when he grades the test
  • not very good at explaining and very hard to understand his english
  • He is hard to understand but if you do the homework and study like every student should do you will not have a problem passing the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are not a math god don't take this class.
  • Lots of homework, but he goes over it in class.
  • lets you use notes and book for tests and exams.

Theme 3

🚩 About Recommendation

  • .
  • I failed his class because I didnt understand him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 20 reviews across many years repeat the same concerns about clarity, workload, and testing.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1206 reviews
MATH1256 reviews
ALG1 review
CHEM12101 review
INTERMEDIATEAL1 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH1 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1021 review
MATH291 review
MATH3001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values