AI Rate Professor

English

Adoracion Lee

ENGWR101 · ENG302 · CCENGW · ENG300 · ENWR41 · ENG101 · ENGLI300 · ENGWR1222 · ENGWR300 · 71 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you , and a highly stressful classroom for a possible passing grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized TeachingHeavy ReadingRude Classroom ToneUnclear GradingPolarizing Personality
  • Most reviews strongly warn against taking Lee because students describe rude, confusing, and unfocused teaching.
  • Some students say passing or even getting an A is possible through persistence, redos, and staying on her good side.
  • The workload is reading-heavy and stressful, with and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A may be possible because some reviews mention redos and , but the stress, workload, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The material and assignments are not always intellectually hard, but , and long papers make the course feel challenging.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently frame the course as stressful despite some easy-grade claims.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews stress showing up, taking notes, and following the calendar, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews discuss class habits, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and stressful grading.

All , and it is strongly negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

because students mention redos and notes on finals, but and favoritism.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Workload is heavy because reviews mention tons of , and a 12-page paper.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Teaching quality is rated very low because many students describe unclear explanations, rambling lectures, poor organization, and disrespectful behavior.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments include readings, quizzes, responses, a research paper, midterms, and a final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing unclear , and , though a minority found her helpful or easy if they followed the work.

Main concern

, and disrespectful classroom interactions.

What students said

“ so far in college!”
ENGWR300
“There is a lot of work to be done, but it isn't very hard.”
ENGWR300
“She is an easy teacher if you complete the class correctly”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , midterms, and a , and one review says notes were allowed in finals.

Two MidtermsOne FinalNotes Allowed In FinalsDaily Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention daily quizzes, two midterms, one final, and one comment says notes were allowed in finals, but .

Two MidtermsOne FinalNotes Allowed In FinalsDaily Quizzes
“ ; .”
300
“Two midterms and .”
300
“Allows notes in finals and do redos.”
ENWR41

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The classwork is simple and straight forward but instruction and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ and can not give a straight answer.”

⚖️

30/100

“Professor Lee has an .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“ so overwhelming.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • There is a lot of work to be done, but it isn't very hard.
  • Lee is an .
  • She has no solid lesson plan which would be fine if there was a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is an easy teacher if you complete the class correctly
  • Allows notes in finals and do redos.
  • if you want to get BY WITH AN EASY A .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • I always felt depressed when I walked into her class.
  • VERY disrespectful towards students in the class.
  • Stay away .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

71

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years provide rich and consistent evidence, with strong agreement on disorganization and poor classroom experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 536

Course coverage

ENGWR30031 reviews
ENGWR1015 reviews
ENG1014 reviews
3002 reviews
ENWR412 reviews
Show 6 more courses
3011 review
CCENGW1 review
ENG3001 review
ENG3021 review
ENGLI3001 review
ENGWR12221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1