AI Rate Professor

English

Rosa Mizerski

ENGWR302 · ENGLI101 · ENGL300 · ENGLISH300 · ENG302 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENWR300 · ENGWR300 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her only if you can handle a polarizing, opinionated instructor and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRambles oftenOpinionatedFair but inconsistent gradingEssay heavyPolarizing
  • Student opinion is sharply split, with some finding her thought-provoking and others calling the class hostile or unfocused.
  • Many reviews say she rambles or goes off topic, which weakens the teaching experience.
  • Grades can be fair or easy for structured essays, but several students describe harshness, bias, or strict expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A and steady work, but comments about harshness, bias, and strict grading make it unreliable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The writing tasks are manageable, but , and subjective expectations make the course harder to navigate.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several students say attendance is important or required for success, and one says you have to attend class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendation is low because many students describe her as unfocused, abrasive, opinionated, and difficult to deal with.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students call grading fair or easy, but many report harsh or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class is essay and reading heavy, but several students say there is little busy work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with , and abrasive interactions.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize essays, papers, drafts, reading, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

complaints about tangents, tone, and viewpoint conflicts, balanced by some praise for fair grading and critical thinking.

Main concern

Students repeatedly complain that lectures ramble, personal opinions dominate, and disagreement may create conflict.

What students said

“She rambles in class and insults pop culture, but has a .”
ENGWR300
“The level of schooling! Stay away!!!”
ENG302
“She's a , and if we didn't do well on one of the .”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but suggests standard or moderately friendly tests, with one review explicitly mentioning a .

MidtermTake-Home FinalTestsEssay-Based Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention midterms, finals, tests, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

MidtermTake-Home FinalTests
“Our class had to write and With a midterm and a .”
ENGLISH300
“ .”
ENGWR300
“she pretty much gives you the answers to the mid term and finals if you pay attention.”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She goes off topic too many times, she includes her opinion on too many subjects.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 in-person , and fit concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Honestly, the only bad part of the lecture was that most of the times it had nothing to do with the material.”

⚖️

52/100

“Grades fairly- you get what you worked for.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rambles in class and insults pop culture
  • She spends class going on tangents.
  • She goes off topic too many times, she includes her opinion on too many subjects.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • as long as you provide evidence and keep to a .
  • Grades fairly- you get what you worked for.
  • . If you are 1 point away from an A she'll give you a B.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • She can be quite abrasive, and literally yelled at me for having the .
  • Her opinions might make you angry, but you don't have to agree with them to get excellent grades.
  • Take the class if you are willing to learn. if you only want a grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 31 detailed in-person reviews with a consistent split between praise for fairness and strong complaints about teaching style.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENGWR30014 reviews
ENG3025 reviews
ENG3003 reviews
ENGWR3023 reviews
ENGWR3012 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENGL3001 review
ENGLI1011 review
ENGLISH3001 review
ENWR3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values