AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Prakash Sah

ENGR400 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want a clear, reasonable engineering instructor who teaches hard material very well.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent explanationsEngineering made clearReasonable workloadStrong lecture notesHighly recommended
  • Both reviews describe outstanding teaching that makes difficult engineering concepts easy to understand.
  • Students say his notes and barely needed beyond homework.
  • The workload is balanced, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A seems realistic with normal note-taking and studying, but students still need to work like engineering students.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The engineering concepts are difficult by nature, but .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because and keeps the workload reasonable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

One A+ and positive comments suggest fair outcomes, but reviews do .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

as just enough to learn without unnecessary assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

, and deep subject knowledge.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention homework but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are extremely positive, highlighting clear explanations, strong notes, and .

Main concern

Evidence is very positive but based on only two reviews.

What students said

“He makes difficult concepts so easy to understand and builds your fundamental skills.”
ENGR400
“He gives just enough homework for students to .”
ENGR400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam policy, format, or proctoring requirements.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He makes difficult concepts so easy to understand and builds your fundamental skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

99/100

“He teaches everything you need to know for the class and provides good notes and explanations.”

👍 Recommendation Level

98/100

“ !”

⚖️ Workload Balance

82/100

“He gives just enough homework for students to .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes difficult concepts so easy to understand and builds your fundamental skills.
  • He teaches everything you need to know for the class and provides good notes and explanations.
  • Knows the subject very well.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Materials

  • You won't need to read the book, only use it for !
  • He gives just enough homework for students to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

The two reviews are detailed and consistent, but the sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR4002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values