AI Rate Professor

Science

Jena Bills

BIO310 · BIO102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can tolerate a dry or tense class in exchange for and manageable material.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair GraderMixed TeachingBoring ClassCondescending ToneSimple Labs
  • , but the classroom experience is inconsistent.
  • One student praises her ability to break down difficult material clearly.
  • Negative comments focus on boredom, condescension, defensiveness, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible and as fair, but students still warn that studying and managing her expectations matter.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material can feel simple or well broken down, with .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and , but the negative tone about boredom and condescension lowers the recommendation.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Two reviews call her fair, and one student got an A, but there is no strong evidence of .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

The course sounds manageable, with simple labs and no strong complaints about heavy workload.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

and complaints that she is boring, condescending, defensive, and slow to return exams.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention exams, labs, studying, and website use, but do not show a .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and some clear explanations offset by complaints about tone and boring delivery.

Main concern

Her attitude and teaching style may frustrate students.

What students said

“she's fair and she is really good at breaking down difficult subjects so even a child would get it.”
BIO310
“I got an A in this class, but it was PAINFULLY boring.”
BIO310
“Make sure you get her good side.”
BIO102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Exams MentionedDelayed Exam Returns

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Exams MentionedDelayed Exam Returns
“However, sometimes she .”
BIO102
“She put her rock climbing weekends ahead of .”
BIO310

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A in this class, but it was PAINFULLY boring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“The teacher was condescending & inept.”

⚖️

58/100

“Furthermore, she also a .”

📘 Course Easiness

68/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is really good at breaking down difficult subjects so even a child would get it.
  • The teacher was condescending & inept.
  • She used the website as her primary teaching tool.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A in this class, but it was PAINFULLY boring.
  • Furthermore, she also a .
  • High advised to you all is to study and .

Theme 3

😟 About Classroom Tone

  • She comes off as grumpy sometimes, but she's fair
  • Make sure you get her good side.
  • She constantly blamed the student and was defensive when a student asked for an explanation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and the opinions conflict enough to limit confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO3102 reviews
BIO1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values