AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maria Herndon

MATH102 · MATH20 · MATH100 · MATH30 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if math is hard for you, unless you are comfortable self-teaching and can tolerate an inconsistent classroom experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teacherOff topic oftenImpatient with questionsBeginner help for someFrequent exams
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with two students praising her as supportive and three describing poor teaching.
  • Negative comments focus on tangents, impatience, disorganization, and .
  • Some beginner math students found her sweet and helpful, but others .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students found the class easy, but , and poor support make an A feel effort-heavy and uncertain.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The math may be basic for some, but , and disorganization make the course feel challenging for struggling students.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but and lecture-based notes make showing up important.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The positive reviews are strong, but most comments warn about rudeness, tangents, and weak help for confused students.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and another says exams come often, with no strong evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Frequent exams and too much material before each test make the workload feel heavy for several students.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching is rated poor overall because most reviews describe tangents, impatience, disorganization, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

because one review says students basically have an .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

help and serious complaints about impatience, organization, and off-topic lectures.

Main concern

The main risk is poor support .

What students said

“She will not stop to slow down 4 u”
MATH100
“I learned nothing from her.”
MATH30
“she made it really easy for me.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention frequent exams and , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, calculator, or closed-book rules.

Frequent ExamsGrading Disputes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention exams every other week and , but reviews do not clearly prove the .

Frequent ExamsGrading Disputes
“You basically have a .”
MATH100
“still graded almost all of .”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If math is hard for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“I learned nothing from her.”

📈 Grade Effort

35/100

“Too ...”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“If math is hard for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tells too much stories
  • She talks to much about herself not enough teaching.
  • She's the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You basically have a .
  • Too ...
  • she made it really easy for me.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • She will not stop to slow down 4 u
  • and always listen to her students
  • she is the sweetest teacher i've eve had.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but the small sample and polarized tone limit certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1002 reviews
MATH1021 review
MATH201 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values