AI Rate Professor

English

Terence Ahearn

ENGWR101 · ENG101 · ENGWR300 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can handle uneven lectures and while using his conference help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful in conferencesInconsistent teachingStrict gradingEssay-heavy workloadEasy in ENGWR101
  • Students split sharply between helpful and .
  • ENGWR101 is often described as easy, while ENGWR300 is tougher and .
  • The strongest value comes for students who can stay on top of essays and use one-on-one help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

ENGWR101 can be easy, but ENGWR300 comments , and little .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Lower-level writing classes sound easy, but ENGWR300 , and daily writing.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , so flexibility cannot be proven.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Some students praise his helpfulness, but several warn that and .

Recommendation and varies strongly by course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Multiple ENGWR300 comments say points are hard to earn and borderline grades go lower.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The , and sustained writing, especially in ENGWR300.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Students describe him as helpful one-on-one but also random, monotone, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and writing rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an uneven teacher who can be helpful and easy in lower writing courses but strict and unclear in ENGWR300.

Main concern

Grading and workload become risky in ENGWR300.

What students said

“ and no easy/small .”
ENGWR300
“his class is very easy.”
ENGWR101
“He's most helpful during conferences-talking with you 1-on-1 about your essays & does this throughout the term.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an final structure.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments but do not clearly prove exam policies.

Exam policy not clearly proven
“Three essays and journal entries everyday.”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. . He cuts more slack & gives less homework than he normally would during the fall/spring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“he doesn't know how to teach and always talks nonsense.”

⚖️

30/100

“if u are on the borderline of grades he will give the lower grade.”

📚 Workload

35/100

“Three essays and journal entries everyday.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesn't know how to teach and always talks nonsense.
  • he is a good teacher and .
  • He speaks in monotone, but randomly yells out a word to try and get the attention of the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • his class is very easy.
  • and no easy/small .
  • he is very hard teacher. if possible

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Procrastinating will lead to your doom or close to it.
  • Three essays and journal entries everyday.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews give useful patterns, but they are old and split across different writing courses.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR1014 reviews
ENGWR3004 reviews
ENG1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1