AI Rate Professor

English

Josh Fernandez

ENG300 · ENGWR300 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to improve your writing and , and steady effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring professorStrong writing instructionRequires effortHonest feedbackRevision focused
  • Most students say Fernandez cares deeply and teaches writing effectively.
  • The class requires effort, revision, and .
  • One review warns that the style may fit journalism or creative .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades seem achievable, but students repeatedly describe hard work, revision, and demanding expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The writing content is manageable for motivated students but difficult for those not ready to revise and improve.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One student explicitly says not to miss class, and another says printed work must be handed in.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him because he genuinely teaches writing and cares about students.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and revision-focused, with .

Format shift

and feedback.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but revision, printing, and changing assignments add real workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students strongly praise his care, passion, and ability to teach writing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The , and printed assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students mostly praise his care and writing instruction while noting that the class can be hard and demanding.

Main concern

The workload and changing homework expectations can frustrate students who only want an easy grade.

What students said

“Fernandez is hard, but I learned to write.”
ENGWR300
“He changes the , and everything -must- be printed and handed in.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fernandez is hard, but I learned to write.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He will teach you to write.”

👍 Recommendation Value

82/100

“ ! Don't miss class.”

📈 Effort Required

42/100

“Fernandez is hard, but I learned to write.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Fernandez is a very passionate professor that loves what he does but understands that students may not.
  • Fernandez is an awesome professor who really cares about his students.
  • Very fun teacher who is honest.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • He will teach you to write.
  • Ensures that you understand the structure of writing an essay and how to properly use citations.
  • Fernandez is hard, but I learned to write.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Fit

  • Make sure to REVISE if you .
  • He changes the , and everything -must- be printed and handed in.
  • if you are a journalism major.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six older reviews are detailed and mostly consistent, though one review gives a narrower warning about course fit.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3005 reviews
ENG3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values