AI Rate Professor

English

Marlo McClurg-Mackinnon

ESL50 · ENGWR101 · ESLW50 · ESLR310 · ESL40 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and do not need steady support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed HelpfulnessUnclear InstructionsNice But InconsistentStrict Expectations
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her nice and .
  • Several , and forgotten or incorrect instructions.
  • Getting an A appears possible if work is completed, but the teaching experience is unreliable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible when students complete all work, but weak instruction may make the effort unpredictable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course content does not sound intellectually extreme, but students.

All course and writing reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because and lack of support.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student reports getting A's by doing the work, but other comments describe perfectionism and poor support.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but completion on time is clearly expected.

Format shift

Only in-person comments discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students call her nice and helpful, but and incorrect instructions.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, errors, and completed work, but do not show a .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

students but confusing and unhelpful for others.

Main concern

Students and inconsistent help.

What students said

“Horrible teacher. Doesn't know how to encourage students.”
ESLW50
“Make most student confuse.”
ESL50
“Do all work and you will do fine.”
ESLR310

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove the .

Test MentionedPolicy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but the exact exam policy is not clearly supported.

Test MentionedPolicy Not Clear
“She even forgot to grade the back side of a test once.”
ESLW50
“She forgot to check the other side of the test and .”
ESL50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible teacher. Doesn't know how to encourage students. Very difficult to understand her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and grade effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Make most student confuse. She forgot to check the other side of the test and . .”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

58/100

“Do all work and you will do fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • NICE AND HELPFUL
  • She is very helpful teacher.
  • Very difficult to understand her.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is not a hard teacher, but a teacher that expects perfection and completion on time.
  • and writing with her and in both of them I got A's.
  • Do all work and you will do fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven old reviews give some consistent themes, but the comments are dated and mixed in detail.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESLR3102 reviews
ESLW502 reviews
ENGWR1011 review
ESL401 review
ESL501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values