AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Jennifer Richie

MODHUM · ANTH310 · WOMENHIST · HUMANITIES310 · HUM310 · HUMAN300 · CULTURALANTHRO · HUM300 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging humanities professor and are willing to keep up with , and projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEnthusiastic lecturerFair graderHumanities focusedEssay basedHelpful after class
  • Students consistently describe Richie as enthusiastic, caring, and strong in humanities and history courses.
  • Grades appear fair, but , and .
  • and finals, with no clear policy on open book or proctoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Getting an A seems realistic with , and projects, but the work is not effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The humanities content is approachable and often enjoyable, though and essay-based assessments.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

as mandatory, but students are told to pay attention to lectures and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair, especially in humanities and history courses.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students call her grading fair, but , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload includes essays, hard homework in some courses, projects, and note-heavy studying, but it is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise her enthusiasm, caring attitude, and engaging humanities teaching, despite one negative anthropology review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments appear to combine essays, projects, , and a final.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and strong humanities teaching.

Main concern

Some students found homework hard or lectures less useful in anthropology.

What students said

“LOVED LOVED LOVED the way she teaches.”
MODHUM
“She's the most enthusiastic teacher I've ever had, and .”
HUM300
“ but i really liked her teaching style & passion.”
ANTH310

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention painting-based midterms and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring rules, or .

Painting MidtermsPainting FinalEssay BasedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, with essays and lecture notes important for preparation.

Painting MidtermsPainting FinalEssay Based
“You'll be tested on paintings for midterms and final.”
HUMANITIES310
“Alot of , but .”
HUMANITIES310

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's the most enthusiastic teacher I've ever had, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessments. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“LOVED LOVED LOVED the way she teaches.”

⚖️

68/100

“She's the most enthusiastic teacher I've ever had, and .”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“ but i really liked her teaching style & passion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can tell that she really likes teaching and humanities.
  • LOVED LOVED LOVED the way she teaches.
  • She's the most enthusiastic teacher I've ever had.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but i really liked her teaching style & passion.
  • curriculum is pretty easy.
  • Alot of , but .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She actually cares about what she's teaching and her students.
  • she helped me after class alot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed but course-specific disagreement.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH3101 review
CULTURALANTHRO1 review
HUM3001 review
HUM3101 review
HUMAN3001 review
Show 3 more courses
HUMANITIES3101 review
MODHUM1 review
WOMENHIST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values