AI Rate Professor

Biology

Margo Stockmayer

BIOBIO · BIOL102 · BIO102 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach , and handle strict or unclear testing.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized teachingHeavy homeworkHard testsStrict attendanceSelf teaching required
  • Most students strongly warn against taking Stockmayer due to unclear teaching, poor organization, and .
  • Workload is repeatedly described as .
  • A minority and can be helpful if students read, study, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

An A appears very hard because students report , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Intro biology is described as hard to grasp, and students say her teaching often makes the material harder to learn.

Only in-person reviews discuss course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Students report strict lateness rules and that they could not miss class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and test-heavy.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Reviews mention , and grading not based on the syllabus.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most reviews describe , weak organization, and self-learning, though one student found her helpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students focus heavily on tests and quizzes, while and demanding.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with complaints , and weak organization.

Main concern

Students say success depends heavily on self-teaching and surviving difficult or .

What students said

“ . do not reccomend taking her class.”
BIOBIO
“It's all self learning.”
BIO102
“lots of homework.”
BIO102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because students say tests and quizzes are hard, poorly aligned, and not supported by , while .

Hard TestsHorrible QuizzesNo Extra CreditUnclear Test CoverageNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, unclear coverage, and no , but do not clearly prove open-book status or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsHorrible QuizzesNo Extra CreditUnclear Test Coverage
“ ”
BIOBIO
“her test and ”
BIO102
“everything she gives you to study is never there.”
BIO102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to teach intro to A& .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Don't expect to learn much from her. It's all self learning.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“lots of homework.”

⚠️

20/100

“ and a lot of material on the in the book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It's all self learning.
  • her lectures are ridiculous and long.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her test and

Theme 3

🕒 About Rules & Workload

  • you can not be more than 2 minutes late
  • you cant never miss her classes
  • and A LOT more after that.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

and mostly consistent, but one strong positive review creates some disagreement.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

BIO1025 reviews
BIOBIO1 review
BIOL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values