AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Rachel Dean

CHEM305 · CA · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Proceed cautiously because one detailed review reports serious teaching problems despite one positive comment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsTeaching MistakesHelpful And NiceHigh Failure Risk
  • One review strongly criticizes her teaching and says many students failed.
  • One shorter and nice.
  • The evidence is sharply mixed but leans risky because the negative review is detailed and severe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A detailed review says more than half the class failed, so getting an A likely requires significant effort or risk.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content may not be inherently impossible, but poor teaching and mistakes can make the course feel harder.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is mixed, but the detailed negative review raises major concerns about teaching quality and outcomes.

Both recommendation signals are in person and conflict sharply.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The report that more than half the class failed suggests harsh outcomes, though .

Format shift

, and the strongest grading evidence is negative.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The reviews do not clearly describe workload volume, so workload cannot be judged as especially light or heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

, but the detailed review reports frequent mistakes and inability to teach.

Format shift

review and one short positive review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The failure-rate complaint implies high-stakes assessment pressure, but .

Format shift

, and assessment details are thin.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about poor teaching and a short positive recommendation.

Main concern

The main concern is a report of frequent mistakes, poor teaching, and a high failure rate.

What students said

“She doesn't know how 2 teach!”
CHEM305
“ and nice. .”
CA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“more than half da class failed!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She doesn't know how 2 teach!”

⚖️

25/100

“more than half da class failed!”

👍 Mixed Recommendation

35/100

“ and nice. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't know how 2 teach!
  • and nice. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • more than half da class failed!
  • ALWAYS make mistakes!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two older reviews with conflicting opinions and limited assessment detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CA1 review
CHEM3051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values