AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kevin Anderson

CISS341 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Take Kevin Anderson if you want a very easy class, but expect outdated material and limited current relevance.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSimple ClassOutdated MaterialsVM LabsLow DifficultyContent Mismatch
  • The course is described as simple and very easy.
  • The main complaint is that the textbook and .
  • The professor received a perfect quality rating, but the only comment focuses more on course content than teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

The class is described as simple with the lowest difficulty rating, so an A likely requires little struggle though no grade evidence is provided.

All .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

The course appears intellectually easy because the student directly calls it simple and gives it very low difficulty.

, so confidence is limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

No review provides online or .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

The easy class and high rating help, but outdated material makes the recommendation conditional.

The but criticizes course relevance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The very low difficulty suggests grading is likely manageable, but the .

Format shift

All grading .

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

The class is called simple and has no workload complaints beyond using old VM-based labs.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

The professor received a perfect quality rating, but the comment mainly criticizes outdated materials rather than praising teaching.

Format shift

, so teaching evidence is thin.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The only assessment-related evidence mentions labs and virtual machines, with .

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single in-person review says the class is simple but disappointing because the content and textbook are outdated.

Main concern

The course may not teach current, practical technology.

What students said

“Simple class however my prime disappointment lies in the text book.”
CISS341
“Content in the course is rather old and it would've been nice to actually of learned something up-to-date.”
CISS341

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove any exam policy or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Simple class however my prime disappointment lies in the text book.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting ease, outdated materials, and course value. Credibility rating: Low.

📘 Course Ease

90/100

“Simple class however my prime disappointment lies in the text book.”

🧪 Course Materials

72/100

“The book is over 8 years old and in order to go through the .”

⚠️ Relevance Concern

68/100

“Content in the course is rather old and it would've been nice to actually of learned something up-to-date.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • Simple class however my prime disappointment lies in the text book.
  • The book is over 8 years old and in order to go through the .

Theme 2

🧭 About Course Value

  • Content in the course is rather old and it would've been nice to actually of learned something up-to-date.
  • Id be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the conclusions are useful but weakly supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CISS3411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values