AI Rate Professor

English

C. Holst

ENG300 · ENGWR302 · ENGWR300 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take him if you want a lively and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat DiscussionsHelpful FeedbackLenient GradingReading QuizzesEngaging Teacher
  • Most students praise him as engaging, helpful, and clear.
  • The workload is manageable, but students must read for quizzes and essays.
  • A , so effort still matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class is not a free A, but lenient grading, easy quizzes, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students often call the class fairly easy, though essays and .

Course-easiness .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

and support, but reviews do not clearly prove it is mandatory.

and quizzes but do not establish a strict attendance rule.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Several reviews call him lenient, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Workload includes essays, reading, and quizzes, but students generally describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and respectful.

Format shift

Teaching-quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and a final in-class essay rather than exam-heavy testing.

Format shift

and quizzes, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students praising his humor, discussion style, help, and manageable assignments.

Main concern

Students need to read assigned texts and handle essays, and .

What students said

“He is also very lenient and getting certain assignments turned in on time.”
ENGWR300
“The to have and READ the textbook”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while proctoring and book policy are not clearly proven.

In-Class Final EssayReading Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

In-Class Final EssayReading Quizzes
“1 in ”
ENG300
“he gives a quiz roughly once every 1 1/2 week”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Mr. Holst is a great professor who really takes the time to flesh out ideas during class.”

⚖️

76/100

“He is also very lenient and getting certain assignments turned in on time.”

📚 Workload Reality

64/100

“The to have and READ the textbook”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome teacher! He is always open to discussions, really understanding, the work is all relevant
  • He's a great professor. Helpful. Always know what he's doing.
  • Very smart and bright young instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was fairly easy for a summer class.
  • and .
  • Grades hard. Expects students to learn how to write effectively and critically.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • we had 4 essays due over an 8 week course and 1 in .
  • Work load was okay. Gotta read the book cause we quizzed on it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine older reviews provide consistent and detailed in-person evidence, though there is no recent or online data.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3006 reviews
ENGWR3022 reviews
ENG3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values