AI Rate Professor

English

Samuel Iniguez

ENGRW300 · ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · ENHWR300 · ENGLISH300 · ENG302 · ENG301 · ENG300 · ENGLISH302 · ENG300302 · ENGWR300 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Samuel Iniguez only if you are an independent writer and handle a polarizing classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing TeacherEssay HeavyStrict GraderAttendance MattersHelpful For Independent Writers
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him inspiring and students .
  • The class is writing-heavy, with , and participation often shaping the grade.
  • Many students say A grades are possible, but , and personality concerns make the experience risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible by following outlines, attending, and doing essays, but strict grading and easy A.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The course structure is mostly essays and outlines, but , and long papers make it harder for some students.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person writing-course reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple reviews say attendance matters, including group critique, participation, and .

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on fit because some students praise his writing instruction while many others describe him as .

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students call the class easy, but repeated comments about hard grading, point deductions, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The , and a final long paper, which many students find manageable but not light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching reviews are mixed, with strong praise for writing structure and support balanced , and professionalism concerns.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is dominated by essays, outlines, papers, peer critique, participation, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a highly polarizing writing professor whose class can be useful and manageable for independent students but frustrating for .

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent student experience, , and repeated personal-boundary complaints.

What students said

“ in their writing.”
ENGWR300
“This class is a lot of work but what english class isnt?”
ENG300
“he grades like Hitler. no one .”
ENG300
“ !”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essays and papers, and they do not clearly prove traditional exam format, book policy, proctoring, midterm policy, or .

Essay-Based AssessmentFinal EssayNo Clear Traditional Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, closed-book rules, or traditional exam format.

Final EssayPaper-Based GradingNo Clear Traditional Exam Policy
“The and its pretty much on almost anything.”
ENGWR300
“His final is a 12-15 page essay on any Genocide.”
ENG302
“he grades you on 4 papers, and participation.”
ENG300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ in their writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“The fundamentals he teaches you are great and you can use them later on.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

55/100

“ in their writing.”

⚖️

45/100

“He grades too hard..and .”

📝 Workload Pattern

48/100

“He makes you write so much essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows his stuff no doubt, but he's very .
  • He is the .
  • This class will teach you nothing.
  • This Prof. knows his stuff and has a unique teaching style that can make any student enjoy writing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Super easy I thought. .
  • He grades too hard..and .
  • EASY GRADE.. JUST LISTEN TO HIS INSTRUCTIONS AND !!!!
  • He gave me a D knowing I did ALL my work, but was late often.

Theme 3

🧭 About Classroom Fit

  • in their writing.
  • Coming to class is a must though since part of your grade is through group critique for every essay
  • He will have you read your work outloud in class, if that .
  • Took him once... !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 46 reviews across several years with detailed and recurring themes, although opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 58
3 out of 58
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGWR30013 reviews
ENG30012 reviews
ENG3026 reviews
ENGWR1016 reviews
ENGRW3002 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGWR3022 reviews
ENG3003021 review
ENG3011 review
ENGLISH3001 review
ENGLISH3021 review
ENHWR3001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1