AI Rate Professor

English

Mark Springer

ENGWR101 · ENGH101 · ENG300 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGWR300 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless , and delayed feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear ExpectationsVery Slow GradingHarsh GraderHeavy Essay LoadPoor Organization
  • Students repeatedly and feedback arrives too late to improve.
  • as very strict, especially for 101-level English courses.
  • The and rewrites, which students found overwhelming.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because , and late feedback even for strong English students.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content is made harder by 300-level expectations, unclear essay requirements, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe the class as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

One student says absences and tardies caused a failing outcome despite earning a B otherwise.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Most students directly because the , and poorly managed.

, and their recommendation tone is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly call him a and say lower-level courses are graded like advanced classes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

The workload is heavy because students mention many essays, rewrites, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe unclear teaching, weak organization, off-topic lectures, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, papers, rewrites, and .

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are consistently negative, with students , and heavy writing demands.

Main concern

Students often do not know how to improve because grades and .

What students said

“he is the ”
ENGWR300
“The Worst teacher in the history of ”
ENGWR101
“He grades very hard. Teaches at a 300 level, not 101.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam format or proctoring policy, so comments.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grading, and they do not clearly prove an .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DON'T TAKE THIS TEACHER! HE IS THE WORST TEACHER THAT YOU CAN HAVE FOR ENGLISH. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ . and assignments easily.”

⚖️

8/100

“He grades very hard. Teaches at a 300 level, not 101.”

👍 Recommendation Level

8/100

“WILL ASSIGN SOMETHING AND CHANGE DATES ON YOU WITHOUT LETTING YOU KNOW. . NEW TEACHER, NOT RECOMMENDED”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • your essays
  • sylubus.
  • He only lectures, no group work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • You'll never know what grade you're going to get in his class not even 1 day before the final.
  • He clearly admitted to us at the end of the last class that he was grading on a 300 level.

Theme 3

📝

  • I had to do 7 essays through out the course, that's just too much for a summer semester.
  • he is the
  • i ended up having to withdrawl cuz once he finally graded my papers he told me i had to redo 4 essays in one week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen detailed in-person reviews across several courses show a highly consistent pattern of , and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGWR1015 reviews
ENGH1014 reviews
ENGWR3004 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
ENG3001 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values