AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Terry Hickham

ARCH330 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

, but treat the conclusion as low-confidence because the sample is tiny.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLowering GradesVery DifficultAvoid Warning
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • The comment specifically complains about grades being lowered.
  • Evidence is very limited because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Getting an A appears very hard because the only review mentions lowered grades and gives maximum difficulty.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

The course appears difficult from the maximum difficulty rating, though the comment gives little detail about content challenge.

, so format evidence is limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The , so flexibility is not clearly proven.

The only evidence is in person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The single student .

, and it is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The only review says grades were lowered, but it gives limited detail about the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not describe workload, so workload cannot be clearly judged.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The only comment is a and gives the lowest quality rating.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not mention assignments, projects, or exams, so the .

Format shift

The .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and complains about lowered grades.

Main concern

The sole student concern is grade lowering and a very negative class experience.

What students said

“ ... lowering grades and trying to be smart ...!”
ARCH330

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ... lowering grades and trying to be smart ...!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ ... lowering grades and trying to be smart ...!”

⚖️

10/100

“lowering grades”

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ ...”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Overall Experience

  • ... lowering grades and trying to be smart ...!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • lowering grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative signal is clear but weakly supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARCH3301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values