AI Rate Professor

English

Arlene Fields

ENGLI300 · ENGWR300 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you want a to engage with.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging TeacherHelpfulHighly RecommendedMakes English InterestingSupportive
  • Students strongly praise Arlene Fields for making English more interesting.
  • Comments emphasize that she helps students who show effort and enthusiasm.
  • All , so confidence is limited by sample size.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades appear fair for students who show enthusiasm and effort, but reviews do not describe a free or automatic A.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

English writing is portrayed as dry but made more understandable and interesting by her teaching.

Only in-person reviews discuss course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There is no online evidence, and policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Every review is enthusiastic and recommends her for being helpful, engaging, and knowledgeable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students praise her help and support, but comments do not clearly prove especially lenient or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reviews do not complain about workload, but English and writing effort.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently , and makes boring material interesting.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

As English writing courses, the likely assessment emphasis is assignments, but reviews do .

Format shift

Assessment and is not detailed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently describe her as , and able to make English interesting.

Main concern

The main limitation is the small review sample rather than a repeated course complaint.

What students said

“ .”
ENGWR300
“SHE HELPED ME A LOT.”
ENGLI300
“Was able to turn a boring and dry subject into something more interesting”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Was able to turn a boring and dry subject into something more interesting, at least as interesting as it can get.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“loved taking her class highly recomend taking her class”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“SHE HELPED ME A LOT.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Made a boring subject more interesting.
  • Was able to turn a boring and dry subject into something more interesting

Theme 2

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • SHE HELPED ME A LOT.
  • SHE ALSO REALLY KNOW HER STUFF.
  • haves fun with teaching

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • loved taking her class highly recomend taking her class
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are old, even though their opinions are very consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3003 reviews
ENGLI3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values