AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Robert Cassinelli

HUM · HUM332 · HUMANITIES300 · HUM310 · HUM300 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning through and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesUnorganizedHard graderEssay heavyHelpful if asked
  • Most reviews describe lectures as , and .
  • as hard or strict, especially for papers.
  • A few students say he is nice and can help when approached, but the teaching experience is weak overall.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but , and heavy essay work that make it costly.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is made , and confusing explanations.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person humanities reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but participation appears important in at least one review.

Only in-person reviews mention participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students repeatedly describe hard or , though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload centers on substantial essay work and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching is widely described as , and poorly prepared.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize essays, papers, participation, and lectures more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews consistently describe confusing lectures, unclear expectations, and to help.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear, disorganized teaching with .

What students said

“This professor was always unclear on what he want, lectures were pointless and he grades hard.”
HUM332
“His lectures jump everywhere. .”
HUM300
“Lectures are so scattered you don't know half the time what he's talking about.”
HUM

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final style.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, midterm style, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lectures are so scattered you don't know half the time what he's talking about.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Lectures are so scattered you don't know half the time what he's talking about.”

⚖️

30/100

“This professor was always unclear on what he want, lectures were pointless and he grades hard.”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“ . !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures jump everywhere. .
  • Professor C is very unorganized, prepares little for his lectures.
  • Cassinelli is a strange man. while to understand what he is talking about!

Theme 2

📄 About Papers And Grades

  • .
  • he grades hard.
  • .
  • mostly lecture and wants lots of essay work.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • A nice man, but sometimes i don't even know what i'm learning in that class!
  • if you really did seek for help.
  • He's a genuinely good man but not the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 11 in-person reviews over several years show consistent complaints about organization, clarity, and grading.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HUM3104 reviews
HUM2 reviews
HUM3002 reviews
HUM3322 reviews
HUMANITIES3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values