AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Manuel Roman

SOCSCI · SOCIOLOGY301 · SOC321 · SOCSC7788 · SOC301 · SOC300301321 · SOC323 · SOC300 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Manuel Roman is worth taking if you attend consistently and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExperienced TeacherCaringDiscussion BasedAttendance StrictExtra Credit Helpful
  • Students often praise his real-world experience and care for students.
  • The class can be easy if students attend, participate, and use .
  • , and boring or student-led class time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students call the class easy and say passing is likely with , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course often feels discussion-based and light on work, though some projects, presentations, and tests require attention.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mostly easy with a few more demanding reports.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because one review says missing three classes can get you dropped and being one minute late counts as absent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most positive reviews recommend him for experience, caring support, and manageable work, despite some complaints about organization.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and somewhat mixed but mostly favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Reviews suggest grades are manageable with attendance and , though one student says extra credit may be needed to pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Students describe barely any work, circle talk, movies, presentations, and easy A or B potential.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many students praise his care, organization, and experience, but and boring class structure.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment appears to mix tests, group work, presentations, projects, participation, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an experienced, caring professor whose classes are often easy but and participation.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“if you come to this class you will surely pass.”
SOC321
“if miss 3 classes he drops you, if you come 1 minute late you’re absent.”
SOC321
“He cares for students.”
SOC301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention multiple-choice tests and review guidance, but .

Multiple-Choice TestsTest ReviewsExtra Credit Helpful

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention multiple-choice tests, test reviews, and random specific questions, but .

Multiple-Choice TestsTest Reviews
“ reviews.”
SOC321
“ and consist of random specific questions from a span of at least 5 chapters.”
SOCIOLOGY301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He cares for students. Helps them during his lunch, before and after class and weekends and holidays.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and character. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“The and reviews.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“He is an extremely good teacher and i have learned alot from him.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

78/100

“Social problem with this guy was no problem...the easiest going teacher ever in any class that i have taken.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tells it like it was and is.
  • The and reviews.
  • The class teaches each other.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you come to this class you will surely pass.
  • and really getting to know the teacher.
  • easy going teacher with a easy A or B

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Treats everyone like he cares and is demanding of quality.
  • He cares for students.
  • Lots of experience that other professors don't have.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 13 older in-person reviews give useful but mixed detail across several sociology courses.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC3215 reviews
SOC3012 reviews
SOC3001 review
SOC3003013211 review
SOC3231 review
Show 3 more courses
SOCIOLOGY3011 review
SOCSC77881 review
SOCSCI1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1