AI Rate Professor

English

Francis Fletcher

ENG252 · ENGLISH300 · ENGLISH256 · ENG300 · ENG1C · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want an engaging English class where steady participation and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent InstructorCritical ThinkingFunnyCaringGrade Padding Assignments
  • Students describe Fletcher as memorable, excellent, funny, and caring.
  • The class can challenge critical thinking, but .
  • Evidence , so format-specific confidence is limited by age.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A seems very achievable if students attend, participate, and complete the .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is not intellectually effortless because he pushes critical thinking, but students say the work is manageable with attention.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but paying attention and participating in class are presented as important for success.

and attention.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because his teaching is memorable, interesting, funny, and supportive.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and one review says failing would be hard if students complete the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload includes many assignments, but students frame them as manageable and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly , and memorable years later.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, class participation, and attention rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students praising his teaching, humor, availability, and fair path to success.

Main concern

Some students may find the critical thinking demands and .

What students said

“He is EXCELLENT instructor.”
ENG1C
“Just pay attention in class, do the assignments and things are a cinch!”
ENGLISH300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had a class with him 7 years ago and I still remember his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He is EXCELLENT instructor.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

94/100

“Take his class if you can!”

⚖️ Grade Path

82/100

“Just pay attention in class, do the assignments and things are a cinch!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really challenges students to think critically.
  • He's also funny.
  • good teaching style, always avalable to help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you participate in the class by answering questions and just speaking up and of course if you do the work, you'll do just fine in the class.
  • As long as you do the to be one hell of a bad writer to fail the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews are consistent and detailed enough to show a strong pattern, but they are old and include one no-comment review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1C1 review
ENG2521 review
ENG3001 review
ENGLISH2561 review
ENGLISH3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values