AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Pam Fredenburg

MATH120 · MATH125 · MATH30 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and attendance.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient TeacherExam Reviews Match TestsGroup QuizzesHomework RequiredFair Grading
  • Most students describe her as patient, helpful, and strong for math learners.
  • if students attend class and .
  • Tests are predictable because review packets and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students say passing is very manageable if , and prepare from her reviews.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The math content still requires practice, but her patience, review packets, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because graded classwork happens in class and cannot always be made up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend her because she is patient, fair, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and predictable exams make grading feel forgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and four tests create steady work, but students often call it manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most reviews describe her as patient, helpful, fair, and especially strong for students who struggle with math.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear to rely heavily on quizzes and and classwork.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly very positive, with students praising , and fair exams.

Main concern

Attendance and classwork matter because missed classwork cannot be made up.

What students said

“ .”
MATH125
“ .”
MATH120
“Her class is impossible to fail.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because reviews say , and one class allowed a 5x7 notecard.

Review PacketsGroup QuizzesDropped Lowest Quiz5x7 NotecardPredictable Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and four tests, with review packets, group quizzes, a dropped quiz, and a 5x7 notecard in one course.

Review PacketsGroup QuizzesDropped Lowest Quiz5x7 NotecardFour Tests Including Final
“the questions on the different numbers and she even allows a 5x7 notecard.”
MATH125
“ .”
MATH120
“ (but !:)”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She is very patient when it comes to helping a student understand.”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“Her class is impossible to fail.”

📝

84/100

“Review packets are AWSOME!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Fredenberg was the .
  • She knows that everyone is at a different level of understanding math.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Go to class, do the HW and you should have no problem passing.
  • Her class is impossible to fail.
  • and .

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • 4 test including final.
  • the questions on the different numbers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews across several years give consistent themes, though the evidence is older and lacks grade data.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1203 reviews
MATH302 reviews
MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values