AI Rate Professor

English

Matthew Abergel

ENGWR302 · ENGWR3001A · ADVCOMP · ENGLISH300 · ENGL302 · ENG302 · HIST302 · ENGLISH · ENGWR200 · COLLEGECOMP · ENGWR300 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want to become a better writer and and active participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent Writing CoachNitpicky GraderDiscussion HeavyChallenging ReadingsFun Class
  • Students repeatedly praise him as a strong English teacher who improves writing.
  • The class can be demanding because he is picky about mechanics, grammar, MLA style, plagiarism, and readings.
  • Most students recommend him, but students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is achievable with reading, proofreading, and participation, but .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course is intellectually moderate to challenging because , and discussion expectations are demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

At least one and warns not to miss more than a few classes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because he makes English engaging and teaches writing skills that .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and mechanics-focused, but several students say the and improves writing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Workload includes readings, papers, discussions, and exams, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Most students , and ability to teach college-level writing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and blue book exams, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly favor his teaching, humor, writing guidance, and discussion style, while and .

Main concern

He can be very picky about writing mechanics, proofreading, and participation.

What students said

“He , but you learn so much from it that .”
ADVCOMP
“ .”
ENG302
“READ!! thats all i can say.”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to standard to somewhat tough reading-based exams, with policies.

Midterms On ReadingsBlue Book ExamsReading-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tough blue book exams, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Midterms On ReadingsBlue Book ExamsReading-Based Exams
“the midterms are all on the ”
ENGWR302
“The .”
ENG302

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He , but you learn so much from it that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He works with you to improve your writing, and actually teaches you how to write properly.”

⚖️

58/100

“He's , so PROOF READ!”

👍 Recommendation Strength

86/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made the class fun. I learned alot.
  • Great at explaining how to write a good essay.
  • he always thouroughly walks you through them so there's no room for incomprehension or confusion.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Nitpicks at EVERYTHING!
  • Very critical about mechanics and plagarism
  • He , but you learn so much from it that .

Theme 3

📚

  • READ!! thats all i can say.
  • .
  • Be involved in , and you will do fine!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one in-person reviews over multiple years provide rich, consistent evidence about teaching, writing standards, workload, and grading.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG3027 reviews
ENGLISH3 reviews
ENGL3022 reviews
ENGWR3022 reviews
ADVCOMP1 review
Show 6 more courses
COLLEGECOMP1 review
ENGLISH3001 review
ENGWR2001 review
ENGWR3001 review
ENGWR3001A1 review
HIST3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values