AI Rate Professor

English

John Bell

ENGWR102 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are prepared to learn the material mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor TeachingUseless ClassLow Preparation Value
  • The single review describes the class as ineffective.
  • The student says the instructor taught nothing.
  • The course did not help prepare for the next class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

There is , so the effort to get an A cannot be judged beyond average difficulty.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The review attacks the teaching quality but does not clearly prove the content itself was easy or hard.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The student strongly discourages the class because they felt it taught nothing and was useless.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is no specific evidence of lenient or .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , so workload cannot be judged confidently.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The review says the instructor taught nothing and the class was useless.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says the class provided little instructional value.

Main concern

The student felt the course taught nothing useful.

What students said

“This guy is horrible!!”
ENGWR102
“Class was useless and did not help prepare for the next class.”
ENGWR102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, or final format.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class was useless and did not help prepare for the next class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and course value; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I had his Enlish writing class and he taught nothing.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“This guy is horrible!!”

📚 Course Value

20/100

“Class was useless and did not help prepare for the next class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This guy is horrible!!
  • I had his Enlish writing class and he taught nothing.

Theme 2

📉 About Course Value

  • Class was useless and did not help prepare for the next class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values