AI Rate Professor

History

Galadriel Highhouse

HIST203A · HIST204A · HIST207B · HIST207A · 207A · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you like lecture-based history, but be cautious online because grading delays and are repeated problems.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyDelayed gradingMixed teaching qualityReading and papersHelpful in person
  • , especially for lectures and support.
  • Grades are often high, but feedback delays and .
  • Online students , and frustrating rubrics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

High grades are common and quizzes are often easy, but papers, reading, and .

, while online reviews show high grades but more frustration with grading and feedback.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The history content is usually understandable, but , and lecture-heavy delivery add moderate challenge.

Online students report more reading and writing strain, while as straightforward.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though one in-person review says skipping class hurts performance.

The ; online reviews do not clearly prove attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students split sharply because , while online learners frequently warn against the class.

, but online reviews are much more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are often high and some students say quizzes or papers are easy, but and .

Format shift

and clearer, while online grading is more often criticized as delayed or subjective.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention papers, dense reading, quizzes, and lecture-heavy work, but most still earn strong grades.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize reading and papers more heavily, while .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with strong in-person praise offset by serious online complaints about communication, preparation, and feedback.

Format shift

In-person teaching is described as engaging and helpful, while online teaching is often called absent or poorly managed.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

, and lectures rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and quizzes, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive, praising personality, helpfulness, and interesting lectures while , and .

Main concern

Lecture-heavy classes and .

What students said

“ .”
HIST207B
“I got an A in the class and worked for it.”
207A
“Lectures are fun and interesting.”
HIST207B

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated , and limited support despite some easy quizzes and high grades.

Main concern

and progress.

What students said

“ assignment and grade it badly just because it's her opinion.”
HIST204A
“Quizzes are easy, but the will mark you correctly spelled answer wrong.”
HIST204A
“Honestly the lectures are key and she does a good job with presenting the material.”
HIST207B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, papers, and some exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Easy QuizzesPapersExams MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final paper, but do not clearly prove exam book rules or .

Easy QuizzesExams MentionedFinal Paper
“assignments are few, but easy: quizzes and writing assignments.”
HIST207A
“She was a good teacher. In fact, the .”
HIST207A

Online

Online reviews mention easy quizzes and paper-heavy work, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Easy QuizzesPaper HeavyPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Quizzes are easy, but the will mark you correctly spelled answer wrong.”
HIST204A
“The dense and hard to process.”
HIST204A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely stay away from her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“The class is pretty lecture heavy but the professor adds a lot of personality which makes it more enjoyable.”

📉 Online Experience

35/100

“Missed many lectures and took weeks to grade even the smallest assignment.”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“It's a easy A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are fun and interesting.
  • Spent more time talking about how she was a single mother than actually teaching the course.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • .
  • I got an A in the class and worked for it.
  • The dense and hard to process.

Theme 3

⏱️ And Communication

  • she claimed she was sick all semester, and took like 3 .
  • Regularly unavailable for office hours and .
  • She is very helpful & will clarify anything for you, just ask!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years and both formats give strong evidence, though opinions are highly split by format.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HIST204A6 reviews
HIST207A5 reviews
HIST207B3 reviews
HIST203A2 reviews
207A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 10

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values