AI Rate Professor

Physics

Erik Veach

205A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are prepared for a very heavy, harshly graded physics course with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely hard gradingHeavy workloadExam mismatchGroup projectsLow recommendation
  • Students consistently describe the course as extremely difficult and workload-heavy.
  • as harsh or unforgiving.
  • because students say examples and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even when students earned decent grades, they describe the class as exhausting, harshly graded, and difficult to pass comfortably.

Online and , with online reviews adding heavy group-project workload.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students describe the topics and exams as very hard, with .

Both formats show very high difficulty, though .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be proven.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

No student clearly recommends the course, and the comments are dominated , and exams.

Online reviews are strongly negative, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Every review mentions harsh or .

Format shift

Both online and .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and a super heavy workload.

Format shift

Online reviews give the strongest workload evidence, while the .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Students report , and very low overall quality ratings.

Format shift

Online reviews are more detailed, while the to learn.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The course appears to combine exams, assignments, and .

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention group projects and exams, while and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and and difficulty learning topics.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“My man is the .”
205a
“It was tough to learn the topics.”
205a

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and exam mismatch.

Main concern

Students say .

What students said

“The workload is super heavy which included group projects (probably the only good part).”
205a
“ and so felt like you went into the exams blind.”
205a
“turn back while you can.”
205a

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say preparation materials do not match the actual exams.

Hard ExamsExam Prep MismatchTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review tags the class as test-heavy but .

Test Heavy
“My man is the .”
205a

Online

Online reviews say exam prep formulas and example questions do not match the exams, but .

Exam Prep MismatchHard Exams
“ and so felt like you went into the exams blind.”
205a
“ .”
205a

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hands down, this was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

12/100

“My man is the .”

📚 Workload

15/100

“The workload is super heavy which included group projects (probably the only good part).”

🧪

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • turn back while you can.
  • and so felt like you went into the exams blind.
  • Extremely hard grading and " .

Theme 2

👥

  • Topics were interesting and the but communicate with your group on who does what.
  • The workload is super heavy which included group projects (probably the only good part).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed, and highly consistent in their criticism.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

205a4 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1