AI Rate Professor

English

Stacy Kimmey

E156 · E201A · ENG201 · ENG156 · 201A · ENGL201A · ENG201A · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you want structured writing support and , but if AI-detection disputes or heavy revision stress would derail you.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackClear rubricsStrict AI policyHeavy writingPolarizing grader
  • Many online students praise her organization, videos, checklists, availability, and .
  • A major negative theme is strict AI detection and expectations felt unfair.
  • This is not an easy A for most students, but steady work, Zoom help, rewrites, and checklists can lead to strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

Good grades are common, but students repeatedly say the class requires real writing effort, revisions, checklists, and careful compliance.

Online evidence shows the main workload and AI-detection burden, while the but are too limited.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

English writing concepts are teachable and well scaffolded for some students, but , and revision standards make the course demanding.

Online reviews describe a structured but hard writing course, while and more favorable.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

86/100

Online reviews describe asynchronous work, Zoom help, and no specific login times, though deadlines still matter.

Flexibility evidence comes mainly from online reviews, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and feedback, but a significant minority warn against stress, AI accusations, and .

Online reviews are strongly split but mostly favorable, while and positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and allows some resubmissions, but and AI-related penalties.

Format shift

Strictness is overwhelmingly an online theme, while and easier tests.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students report lots of reading, writing, papers, drafts, checklists, and revisions, which fits a demanding English course.

Format shift

Online workload is well documented, while .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students value her organization, feedback, videos, and availability, but .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is highly detailed and mixed, while but positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear to center on essays, drafts, reading logs, writing assignments, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support assignment-heavy assessment, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person evidence is limited but , and easy tests.

Main concern

The main concern is limited evidence, with .

What students said

“ ”
ENG201A
“ needed.”
ENGL201A

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews dominate and show a structured but demanding English course with strong support, strict writing rules, and recurring AI-detector conflict.

Main concern

The main concern is strict grading around essays, AI detection, and for some students.

What students said

“An easy A if you do the work and .”
201A
“Be ready to be accused of using AI for if you didn't.”
ENG201A
“ and tests, but not for everything.”
E201A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some quizzes, tests, or big exams use proctoring, though not every assessment is proctored.

Proctoring For Big ExamsHonorlockContent Access During QuizzesCertain Quizzes And Tests Proctored

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews only mention easy tests and paper review, with , or final format.

Easy Tests
“ needed.”
ENGL201A

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention proctoring for big exams, Honorlock, and some content access during quizzes, but not webcam details or .

Proctoring For Big ExamsHonorlockContent Access During QuizzesCertain Quizzes And Tests Proctored
“ .”
E201A
“She uses honorlock and does not allow AI at all”
201A
“She allows you to access her .”
E201A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This isn't a fluff class but I learned more from her than all my High school english classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and AI-policy concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and detailed and hands down gave me the .”

⚖️

38/100

“Be ready to be accused of using AI for if you didn't.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“If you're looking for an easy A this isn't the right class.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Support

  • , and gave a ton of feedback.
  • Zooming with her is the .
  • She answers emails quickly.

Theme 2

📝

  • Lots of
  • .
  • and MLA.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • She uses honorlock and does not allow AI at all
  • I am tired of pulling all-nighters to satisfy these stupid AI detectors.
  • She

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 34 reviews are detailed and recent, though evidence.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

201A13 reviews
ENGL201A7 reviews
E201A6 reviews
ENG201A3 reviews
E1562 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG1562 reviews
ENG2011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

15

B+ 10 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 3