AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Donald Repucci

CNET253 · COMPUTERREPAIR · CNET254 · ROPREPAIR · ROPCR1111 · ELTCH7076 · ELTECH153 · COMP201A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle high expectations, but if you need a warm and approachable classroom.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding InstructorDeep Practical KnowledgeHigh ExpectationsTough To ApproachOlder Review Base
  • Most older reviews praise his knowledge, practical teaching, and ability to make students learn deeply.
  • The newest review is sharply negative and describes fear asking questions, heavy work, and .
  • He appears best for students who want serious vocational learning and can handle a demanding personality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A strong grade may be possible, but comments , and lots of homework.

; there is no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is teachable and practical, but students repeatedly describe him as serious, demanding, and focused on mastery.

, and they show a standard-to-challenging classroom rather than an easy course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

One review says some students could test out and attend only for tests, but another says participation matters, so flexibility is limited and inconsistent.

online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Older students strongly praise him, but the recent negative review and 0 percent take-again data create major caution.

All recommendation evidence is in person, and it conflicts between very positive older reviews and one severe recent review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and real effort being needed to impress him.

Format shift

; no online grading evidence exists.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The clearest workload evidence includes lots of , and high expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise his knowledge and teaching impact, but approachability is a serious risk in the newest review.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and the only recent review is much more negative than the older pattern.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, presentations, participation, and assignment structure.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, with mostly strong older praise for practical expertise but one recent severe warning about fear, workload, and grading.

Main concern

His demanding style may feel intimidating or difficult to approach for some students.

What students said

“Terrible. Felt fear asking him any questions.”
COMP201A
“Repucci is easily the elsewhere.”
CNET253
“He can be tough to deal with, but only because he expects the ”
COMP201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Tests MentionedPresentation MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a group presentation, but they do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedPresentation Mentioned
“I missed a few tests”
CNET254
“ ”
CNET253
“had to leave our group presentation”
CNET254

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He can be tough to deal with, but only because he expects the , and in the long run, it really helps.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality, difficulty, and approachability. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Repucci is easily the elsewhere.”

⚠️ Approachability Risk

52/100

“Terrible. Felt fear asking him any questions.”

📚 Learning Depth

78/100

“He will make sure you know what your doing and talking about before you exit the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr.Repucci is an excellent professor.
  • he teaches you to not do anything stupid, to make sure you know what your doing and to do it right
  • his class (253) was NEVER boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Expectations

  • expected a lot from me
  • If you put in some real effort Repucci can be impressed.
  • He can be tough to deal with, but only because he expects the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Comfort

  • Terrible. Felt fear asking him any questions.
  • took special care to make sure everyone was paying attention.
  • Great teacher, took basic computer class and he allowed people like me who know a lot about computer hardware and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

There are ten reviews, but most are very old and only one recent review sharply contradicts the older positive pattern.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CNET2532 reviews
COMP201A2 reviews
CNET2541 review
COMPUTERREPAIR1 review
ELTCH70761 review
Show 3 more courses
ELTECH1531 review
ROPCR11111 review
ROPREPAIR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values