AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shelby Burnett

MATH232 · MATH127 · MATH242 · CALC2 · MATH265B · MATH71192 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
65.79%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her only if you are comfortable learning math independently and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOnline math polarizerHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching riskStrict examsClear study guides
  • Older and positive reviews praise her online structure, videos, responsiveness, and .
  • Recent online MATH242 reviews are sharply negative about self-teaching, mismatched exams, and .
  • The course can produce A grades, but , and strong math confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many students earn A grades, but the A often , and performing on strict exams.

Online evidence is more polarized and riskier, while in-person evidence suggests clearer expectations but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Precalculus, trigonometry, and calculus are described as fast-paced, concept-heavy, and hard if math is not already a strength.

Online reviews emphasize self-teaching and , while and homework gaps.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and , while no broad optional-attendance pattern is proven.

Online reviews clearly mention in-person exams, while one .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations depend heavily on course, year, and student independence because .

Online reviews are deeply divided, while negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Several students say she grades harshly, requires her , and uses difficult exams.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest strict-grading evidence, while and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Homework is repeatedly described as lots, ridiculous, or .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize heavy homework most often, while and math lab.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with some students praising clear videos and support while many recent online students say they had to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is split sharply by review period, while but less severe.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Homework is frequent, but student risk , and .

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly discuss difficult or , while and tests not matching.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but somewhat steadier, with praise for clarity and and math-lab complaints.

Main concern

The and occasional gaps between teaching and assignments.

What students said

“Her and pretty easy for the most part.”
MATH242
“ grade.”
MATH127
“she doesn't always go over everything she needs to in order to do all the .”
MATH232

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly split, with strong praise for resources in some courses but severe recent complaints about self-teaching and difficult exams.

Main concern

Online students may feel unsupported when videos and .

What students said

“Be prepared to teach yourself.”
MATH242
“The .”
MATH242
“Clearest study guides ever. . .”
MATH242

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style is strict because reviews explicitly mention hard timed , and harsh method-specific grading.

Hard Timed ExamsIn-Person Proctored ExamsNo Notes ExamsNo CurveMethod-Specific Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy, but they mention homework-test mismatch and required math lab.

Homework-Test MismatchMandatory Math Lab
“Homework and .”
MATH127
“ grade.”
MATH127

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention in-person proctored exams, no-notes exams, hard timed exams, and .

In-Person Proctored ExamsNo Notes ExamsHard Timed ExamsNo Curve
“There are 5 in-person proctored exams.”
MATH265B
“Be warned this course has in !”
MATH265B
“ and are graded in HER particular way ONLY.”
MATH242

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself. If you have a job forget about it, she doesn't want to help you and requires you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Professor Burnett is one of the .”

⚠️ Self-Teaching Risk

34/100

“You will spend HOURS teaching yourself everything.”

🧪

30/100

“ and are graded in HER particular way ONLY.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She links 3-5 minute YouTube videos in each module which do not cover much of the .
  • They have great lecture videos.
  • Does an excellent job of teaching mathematics online.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Ridiculous amount of hw.
  • Lots of homework
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams and Grading

  • There are 5 in-person proctored exams.
  • No recorded lectures, 5min YouTube video that .
  • She has a very giving late policy and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 38 reviews cover online and and repeated themes, though opinions are strongly split.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH24224 reviews
MATH265B8 reviews
MATH1272 reviews
MATH2322 reviews
CALC21 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH711921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

15

A 14 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

7

C+ 4 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1