AI Rate Professor

History

Brooke Richter

Courses not reported · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you can handle , and limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOverwhelming workloadHarsh gradingUnclear expectationsPoor communicationTest and quiz heavy
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the workload as excessive, especially in online dual-enrollment courses.
  • , and difficult to challenge.
  • Students report , and stressful quiz or test expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show the A , and stress.

Online evidence is much stronger and shows heavy work; in-person evidence also reports 9-15 hours weekly and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels difficult mainly because of , and high-stakes quizzes rather than content support.

Online reviews emphasize excessive assignments and quiz pressure, while and complicated tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, but deadlines and course pacing are described as strict and inflexible.

Online comments focus on deadlines and Canvas workload, while in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students because , and support are poor.

Both formats are negative, with online reviews providing broader and more detailed avoidance evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly report rough grading, , and inconsistent standards.

Format shift

Online reviews heavily criticize grading, and .

Workload

Overwhelming

6/100

Reviews repeatedly , and 9-15 weekly hours.

Format shift

Online workload complaints dominate the evidence, while expectations.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe unclear lectures, poor communication, weak support, and little interest in whether students understand.

Format shift

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, and in-person reviews also report difficulty getting help and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Assessment appears dominated by quizzes, tests, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest evidence of quiz and test weight, while and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also negative and , and heavy weekly time demands.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She is a and hard to get ahold of outside class.”
34824
“ and will often change her rubric and interpret it differently with each assignment.”
34824

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, emphasizing , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students report , and little useful support.

What students said

“ if you want to have free time.”
34823
“Professor Richter does not give clear instructions on assignments, creates our quizzes on material we are not required .”
34823

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam and quiz structure is described as strict, difficult, and poorly supported, but reviews .

High-Stakes QuizzesComplicated TestsHarsh Quiz GradingUnclear Test Coverage

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture-heavy or obscure topics, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Complicated TestsLecture-Heavy Tests
“The and lecture-heavy or on obscure topics not highlighted very much in the class.”
34824

Online

Online reviews describe frequent high-stakes quizzes and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, or open-book rules.

High-Stakes QuizzesTests With Little WarningUnclear Quiz Coverage
“Will give you a lot of quizzes that are worth 40% of grades and usually students high scores would be 14/20 which isn't even a B.”
34823
“Tests and .”
73305
“ learn”
34823

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching support. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

6/100

“She expects us to spend at least 4 hours on the , and she expects us to work 12 hours EACH WEEK on this one class.”

⚖️

8/100

“She grades completely unfairly.”

📨 Communication

12/100

“rarely follows through on responding to important emails.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • She gives an absurd amount of work considering the majority of her students are highschool kids who have 6 other classes and sets demanding deadlines for the assignments.
  • Had to dedicate hours of my weekend to this class.
  • way .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • and will often change her rubric and interpret it differently with each assignment.
  • and still get points deducted for no reason at all.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • The lectures provided little information.
  • with grades, misgrades and does not respond to student emails about grades
  • It often felt like we were being set up to fail rather than to learn.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen recent reviews are detailed and highly consistent, , and communication complaints.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 58
1 out of 511

Course coverage

3482311 reviews
348246 reviews
733052 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 3 · A- 4

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values