AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Victor Krulikowski

POLSC202 · POLS30325 · GOVPOL202 · POL209 · POLS201 · POLI202 · POLS204 · POLISCI9 · POLS202 · POLISCI · POLS209 · AMGOVT · POLI201 · 135 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
57.58%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable learning from readings and lectures independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReading-heavyTest-focused gradingPolarizing lecturesTough graderOnline proctoring concerns
  • Student experiences are highly split, with some calling lectures excellent and .
  • The and note-taking, with grades commonly driven by quizzes and exams.
  • Online reviews raise stronger concerns , and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earn A grades by reading, taking notes, and completing assignments, but tests and .

Online reviews include both easy-A claims and severe test complaints, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material can be understandable with effort, but many students , and introductory classes that feel too hard.

Online reviews more often report unclear structure and , while and over-difficult content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews suggest lectures and notes are important for passing, but they do not clearly prove a .

, while online reviews focus on keeping up with posted readings and lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

He is recommended by students who like political science and independent reading, but many others , and tests.

Online recommendation is weaker because of proctoring and communication complaints, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Many reviews call him a tough or , and short-answer questions.

Format shift

especially critical of exams and feedback.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, long lectures, textbooks, quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize reading and quizzes, while and busy work.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is highly polarizing, with many strong lecture praise comments balanced by many reports of .

Format shift

Online teaching receives more complaints about organization and communication, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are often described as , and a smaller number of homework assignments.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, though online reviews more often mention proctored quizzes and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also polarizing, with entertaining lectures for some students but , and occasional complaints about rudeness or .

Main concern

and a blunt teaching style.

What students said

“Lectures are entertaining and overall engaging.”
AMGOVT
“they do not make the material digestible for an introductory level class.”
POLI202
“He gives you study guides and all the info you prepare.”
POLS209

Remote format

Online

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with strong praise for structured lectures but repeated complaints , and poor communication.

Main concern

Online students often struggle with , and inconsistent support.

What students said

“ and proctored by Honorlock.”
POLISCI
“ but just need to lock in a little more for the tests.”
POLS202
“Might be better in person but .”
POLS204

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews repeatedly describe proctored, timed, vague, or .

Honorlock ProctoringTimed Online ExamsMultiple Choice and Essay QuestionsQuizzes and ExamsStudy Guide Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy, but they describe difficult quizzes and exams, study-guide mismatch, and one allowed exam note sheet.

Quizzes and ExamsStudy Guide MismatchExam Note Sheet
“He gives you study guides and all the info you prepare.”
POLS209
“Written questions were the most difficult.”
POLSC202
“the guide.”
POLI202

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe Honorlock-proctored, timed quizzes and exams, with vague questions and .

Honorlock ProctoringTimed Online ExamsMultiple Choice and Essay QuestionsQuizzes and Exams
“ and proctored by Honorlock.”
POLISCI
“ and timed.”
POLS202
“There are 3 quizzes and 2 midterms and 1 final.”
POLS202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you're a poli sci major who's actually interested in the subject matter.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“His lectures are informative and engaging.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“TONS of reading. I mean, A TON.”

🧪

30/100

“ and timed.”

👍 Recommendation Level

48/100

“Might be better in person but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are entertaining and overall engaging.
  • His lectures were great and really helped me understand the topic.
  • barely teaches. .
  • and expectations.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • a bit of a , but as long as youre thorough in the homework and short answer q. on exams and
  • Your grade and exams and then a .
  • Tons of busy work leave you fighting for a good grade and feeling like you didn't learn anything.
  • If you read, you'll do fine on those.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • and proctored by Honorlock.
  • The questions are vague and difficult to study for since .
  • The caused me to fail the class.
  • He gives you study guides and all the info you prepare.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

135

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, consistent patterns despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 574
4 out of 523
3 out of 512
2 out of 57
1 out of 519

Course coverage

POLS20219 reviews
POLS2048 reviews
POLI2027 reviews
POLS2094 reviews
GOVPOL2023 reviews
Show 9 more courses
2021 review
AMGOVT1 review
POL2091 review
POLI2011 review
POLISCI1 review
POLISCI91 review
POLS2011 review
POLS303251 review
POLSC2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2