AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Jason Kassel

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable with an unstructured course and very limited evidence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor course focusAI-heavy class workWeak recommendationUnclear academic value
  • The only review is strongly negative and says the course did not feel like political science.
  • The student reports heavy in-class ChatGPT use as a main source for research.
  • Assessment evidence is limited but mentions a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The student earned an A, but the review gives too little evidence to say the A was easy or predictable.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The because the complaint focuses on poor focus and course quality rather than hard content.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student explicitly advises choosing a different professor because the course felt unfocused and poorly supported.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The student earned an A, but there is .

Format shift

Only one in-person review is available, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The because the review focuses on course content and the .

Format shift

evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The review describes the class as off-topic and says the professor relied on ChatGPT for in-class research.

Format shift

Teaching evidence , so confidence is low.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The only assessment detail says the final was four questions worth 100 points.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it mentions the final but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The weak political science focus and heavy use of ChatGPT in class.

Main concern

The main concern is course quality and relevance to political science.

What students said

“This is not Poli-Sci, this is ChatGPT 101 and Transgender Topics”
30329
“He uses ChatGPT as his main source for all of his research that he does IN CLASS”
30329
“Get a different professor.”
30329

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The 100 points, with no proof of proctoring, open-book rules, or strict exam controls.

Four-Question Final

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The worth 100 points, but does not clearly prove format, proctoring, or book policy.

Four-Question Final
“The Final was 4 questions worth 100 points.”
30329

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get a different professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the available themes in course focus and assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

10/100

“Get a different professor.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He uses ChatGPT as his main source for all of his research that he does IN CLASS”

📝 Assessment Snapshot

45/100

“The Final was 4 questions worth 100 points.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Course Focus

  • This is not Poli-Sci, this is ChatGPT 101 and Transgender Topics
  • He uses ChatGPT as his main source for all of his research that he does IN CLASS

Theme 2

🧪

  • The Final was 4 questions worth 100 points.
  • Get a different professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative signal is strong but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

303291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values