AI Rate Professor

Art

Sommer Sheffield

ART222 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want hands-on drawing foundations and can handle a rigid, sometimes frustrating class environment.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful feedbackMixed teaching toneHeavy paper workloadShort project deadlinesBeginner drawing support
  • Students split and finding her rude or patronizing.
  • Drawing basics can build confidence, but the class may feel lecture-heavy and not very fun.
  • , and short deadlines for large projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting a high grade appears possible, but , and short deadlines rather than an easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The drawing concepts are foundational, but the workload and than easy.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person Art222 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because the about tone, workload, and deadlines.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grades include an A+ but also two B- grades and one withdrawal, with comments emphasizing .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students specifically mention lots of papers, massive paper use, and one week for a 200-plus-frame animation project.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

and serious complaints about rudeness, patronizing behavior, and slide reading.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize papers, drawing projects, and animation work, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

feedback and beginner support offset by complaints about rudeness and workload.

Main concern

Students may , and a teaching style some find patronizing.

What students said

“She is attentive and always ready to help.”
Art222
“Rude and cocky for no reason.”
Art222
“Uses massive amounts of paper and gives short deadlines for .”
Art222

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I now have a into practice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and classroom tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She is attentive and always ready to help.”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

38/100

“Not a horrible professor but incredibly patronizing.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Uses massive amounts of paper and gives short deadlines for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is attentive and always ready to help.
  • and like 15 minutes to actually draw.
  • Not a horrible professor but incredibly patronizing.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • lots of papers
  • Uses massive amounts of paper and gives short deadlines for .
  • One week for 200+ frames planning and all.

Theme 3

📈 About Student Outcome

  • I now have a into practice.
  • work thanks to her.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but sharply conflicting evidence, so confidence is moderate.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Art2224 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1