AI Rate Professor

Education

Michelle Gordon

PARENTING · CDFS201 · ECE101 · ECE1 · ECE215201 · HDHS217 · FMST2116 · ECE201 · ECE215 · ECE2 · FMST216 · FMST212 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a caring education professor and , and occasional grading frustration.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveClear assignment expectationsInteractive lecturesMixed grading fairnessReading and quizzes
  • Most students describe Gordon as kind, knowledgeable, and invested in student success.
  • Online reviews are more polarized, with strong praise for clarity but repeated complaints about tough or .
  • Grades can be strong when students follow detailed instructions, but the class is not always low-effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A strong grade is realistic with careful work, , and following instructions, but easy A.

Online evidence includes both easy and harsh grading complaints, while from attendance and following instructions.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The content is usually approachable and well explained, but , and .

Online reviews mention reading and quizzes more often, while and practical education topics.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but participation and class presence are repeatedly useful.

In-person reviews stress participation and lecture value, while online reviews mention scheduled work and workshops but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her for care, clarity, and knowledge, but .

, while online reviews are more divided between excellent structure and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and sometimes supported by , but several students call her tough or unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest tough-grader complaints, while as fair if instructions are followed.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable for many students but , and detailed assignment rules.

Format shift

Online students mention reading, quizzes, and submissions, while , and study guides.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews praise her as , and engaging despite a few harsh negative experiences.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize engaging lectures and mentorship, while , and responsiveness.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment , and some tests rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, a midterm, and a final, while , and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly praise her energy, clarity, and care, while a few describe her as critical or overly demanding.

Main concern

Lectures and expectations can feel long, personal, or demanding for some students.

What students said

“A super uplifting and and genuinely cares about her students' success.”
CDFS201
“Her class isn't super hard, just make sure to follow her specific instructions and you'll do great.”
ECE201
“Michelle was a wonderful teacher, however she was really hard.”
ECE201

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students often praise clear structure and support, but several .

Main concern

and workload feel inconsistent across classes.

What students said

“ and gives great feedback.”
CDFS201
“She is an unfair and together.”
PARENTING
“One chapter a week with an submission, and everything was explained clearly with plenty of time to get things done.”
ECE201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because comments mention open-book quizzes and unproctored online tests, but not all formats are clearly documented.

Open-Book QuizUnproctored Online TestsChapter QuizzesMidterm And Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or a .

Quizzes MentionedStudy Guides Mentioned
“USE the notes on your quizes!!”
ECE215
“ !”
ECE201

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention unproctored , and .

Unproctored TestsOpen-Book QuizChapter QuizzesOne MidtermOne Final
“ ”
CDFS201
“One chapter a week with an submission”
ECE201
“About 13 quizs per chptr 1Mid 1Final.”
CDFS201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A super uplifting and and genuinely cares about her students' success.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Michele is very sweet and understanding. and gives great feedback.”

⚖️

52/100

“She is an unfair and together.”

👍 Recommendation Level

76/100

“ !! Her class isn't super hard, just make sure to follow her specific instructions and you'll do great.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very passionate about the subject and student success.
  • She is so well spoken and easy to understand.
  • A super uplifting and and genuinely cares about her students' success.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Overall, her class is a easy "A or B"
  • Michelle was a wonderful teacher, however she was really hard.
  • She has a and rarely gives a single compliment, even if you score high.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • This was easily the .
  • I took her class online and it was crazy hard.
  • Really good class. Not to hard especially if you get all your work in and dont miss things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 23 reviews span many years, include both formats, and provide consistent themes about care, structure, and grading.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ECE2016 reviews
CDFS2014 reviews
ECE12 reviews
ECE2152 reviews
PARENTING2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ECE1011 review
ECE21 review
ECE2152011 review
FMST21161 review
FMST2121 review
FMST2161 review
HDHS2171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values