AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Emily Kane

OCEN210 · ENVS200 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Choose Kane in person when possible, but be cautious with online sections because and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong in-person lecturesOnline exam confusionCaring and responsiveLow to moderate homeworkCanvas and grading issues
  • Kane is much stronger in person, where students praise lectures, easy tests, and clear class flow.
  • Online reviews are mixed to negative because , and module errors create frustration.
  • and helpful, but assessment design can make the course feel harder than the content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

A grades are common and , but online exams and .

and grade padding, while online evidence shows harder exams and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course material is manageable with lectures and notes, but .

In-person students find the content clearer and easier, while online students and missing information.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance is not proven mandatory, but lectures.

In-person reviews repeatedly say lectures are key, while and weekly work rather than attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

person because her lectures and support offset the workload.

In-person reviews are strongly favorable, while online reviews are mixed because kindness and Canvas frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

She can grade easily in person, but and .

Format shift

and retakes, while online evidence reports tough or .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Homework is often light or manageable, but , and .

Format shift

In-person , while online reviews mention lots of homework and late major projects.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often caring, passionate, and engaging, but online organization problems weaken the experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching is , and email support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

and exams, with projects, quizzes, and .

Format shift

and projects, while online reviews repeatedly focus on exams, quizzes, and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students usually praise , and , though one review reports confusion and bad due dates.

Main concern

Projects and .

What students said

“ !”
OCEN210
“Great teacher, easy class, all lecture slides posted on canvas, weekly homework (multiple choice based on reading that can be retaken easily) that pads grade”
ENVS200
“ so I dropped her class.”
31986

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe Kane as nice and helpful, but , and heavier workload.

Main concern

Online exams and .

What students said

“ , and i've taken anatomy.”
OCEN210
“There were and she had to go back and fix something to reflect an accurate grade.”
31986
“ and test because I had work so she extended it several times.”
31986

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies by format, with easy in-person tests but .

Easy In-Person TestsCritical Thinking ExamsOpen Note QuizzesTests Every Three Weeks

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, study guides, and allowed note sheets.

Easy TestsThree Major ExamsOpen Note QuizzesNote Sheets Allowed
“she ”
ENVS200
“ .”
OCEN210
“ , and allow note sheets.”
OCEN210

Online

Online , and tests every three weeks, but do not prove proctoring or .

Confusing ExamsTests Every Three WeeksQuizzes Mentioned
“ , and i've taken anatomy.”
OCEN210
“ and tests/quizzes do not include information found in the notes”
31986
“but she does test every 3 weeks.”
31986

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! She is thorough with her lectures to the point where you would have to actively try to not listen to be lost.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ ; she had great lectures, easy tests, and was pretty funny and entertaining.”

💻 Online Risk

50/100

“ , and i've taken anatomy.”

⚖️

60/100

“There were and she had to go back and fix something to reflect an accurate grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • clearly very passionate about what she teaches which made it more interesting
  • and especially with questions before the final.
  • , but I never understood her teaching style.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and quick if you .
  • Lots of critical thinking needed.
  • and tests/quizzes do not include information found in the notes

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • Loved online format for weekly material.
  • There were definitions in the online modules that were incorrect and words misspelled.
  • The teacher's aid and skipped Zoom hours more than once.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 recent reviews cover both online and .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

OCEN2106 reviews
319865 reviews
ENVS2002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 5 · A- 3

B range

3

B 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2