AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Pam Ridgely

ENGR251 · ENG251 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
2/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor if if and guided instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderPoor ExplanationsSelf-Teaching RequiredOverwhelming WorkloadAvoid If Possible
  • All reviews are strongly negative and describe poor teaching effectiveness.
  • Students report , and very high difficulty.
  • Comments say students had to teach themselves and if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

The limited grade evidence and , and very low chance of an easy A.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

6/100

Students describe the course as very hard because too much information is .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students explicitly warn others to take the class with someone else because the teaching and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Reviews directly call her a and describe the course as .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students mention lots of homework and a and difficulty are overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students say she does not clearly explain material, does not give useful examples, and leaves students to self-teach.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The reviews mention tough grading and homework but do not clearly prove .

Format shift

All assessment evidence is from in-person reviews, but the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe the course as extremely difficult, poorly taught, and .

Main concern

Students say and the course requires self-teaching.

What students said

“ and .”
ENGR251
“You will teach yourself dynamics in this class because she does not give examples, or .”
ENG251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“She'll throw a ton of info at you, but leave you with no idea how to use or apply it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“If !”

⚖️

5/100

“Really bad. and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The class as a whole actually stopped her one day to inform her that how she teaches isn't working.
  • You will teach yourself dynamics in this class because she does not give examples, or .
  • She will not answer questions regarding core material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Really bad. and .
  • Class started out with ~40 of us, by the time i finally dropped it there were only 5 of us left.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and two are old, but the and specific.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGR2512 reviews
ENG2511 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values