AI Rate Professor

Hospitality

Kendi Root

HOSP200 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and strong grade upside.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging teacherOrganized courseStudent friendlyFair workloadFlexible late work
  • All reviews are highly positive and say Kendi Root is engaging, organized, and easy to understand.
  • Grades are very strong, with all reported grades in the A range and comments describing reasonable work.
  • Online evidence highlights easy navigation and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

All reported grades are A-level and , and late-work opportunities.

Online evidence is especially grade-friendly due to late-work flexibility, while and strong outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course appears accessible because students say she , and uses interesting material.

Online evidence emphasizes easy navigation, while and engagement despite lecture length.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

Participation matters in the class, but reviews do not clearly describe a .

In-person reviews stress participation during lectures, while the online review focuses on .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every student recommends her because , and makes the class enjoyable.

Both online and focused on support and in-person praise focused on engagement.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

All reported grades are A-level, and the online review mentions plenty of chances to submit late assignments.

Format shift

Online evidence directly supports flexibility, while and reasonable work.

Workload

Light

82/100

Students describe the work as easy to navigate, fun, interesting, and the right amount, though lectures can be long.

Format shift

Online workload sounds very light and flexible, while but participation-heavy.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as , and genuinely invested in student success.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with online comments highlighting clarity and in-person comments highlighting engagement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention assignments, participation, lectures, and coursework, but as a .

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on assignments, while and lecture-based engagement.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews describe an engaging, fun, thoughtfully organized class with participation-heavy lectures and reasonable work.

Main concern

Lecture-heavy sessions can feel long, especially in the evening.

What students said

“Kendi is amazing.”
HOSP200
“There was just the right amount of work and it was all interesting to me.”
HOSP200

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review says assignments were easy to navigate, sometimes fun, and .

Main concern

Only , so confidence is limited.

What students said

“ and some were even fun.”
HOSP200
“will give you plenty of opportunities to turn in late assignments.”
HOSP200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , or final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She genuinely wants you to succeed, and will give you plenty of opportunities to turn in late assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She is a great teacher. Very easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Level

100/100

“I've signed up for two more classes with her just because I enjoyed this class so much.”

⚖️

92/100

“will give you plenty of opportunities to turn in late assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Kendi is amazing.
  • She is so engaging, and you can tell she loves her job and helping others.
  • She is a great teacher. Very easy to understand.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Organization

  • and some were even fun.
  • There was just the right amount of work and it was all interesting to me.
  • Introduction to Hospitality was one of the and most fun classes I have ever taken.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She genuinely wants you to succeed
  • I've signed up for two more classes with her just because I enjoyed this class so much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 3 reviews, though all are detailed, recent enough, and fully consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HOSP2003 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values